Cited by 302Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEducational Research and MethodsStatistics Education and Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond small, medium, or large: points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes

Open access
Bakker, Arthur, Cai, Jinfa, English, Lyn, Kaiser, Gabriele, Mesa, Vilma, Van Dooren, Wim·2019·Educational Studies in Mathematics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size, stupid. What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Exeter, UK. Retrieved July 24, 2019 from https://www.cem.org/attachments/ebe/ESguide.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 301

Metadata

Authors
Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V., & Van Dooren, W.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Arthur
Venue
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
2019-07-30
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0013-1954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0816
OpenAlex
W2966650813
Cited by
302
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6
FWCI
22.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Studies in Mathematics (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
effect size, statistical significance, mathematics education research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review