Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry

Schindler, Maike, Lilienthal, Achim J.·2019·Educational Studies in Mathematics
DOI 10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 33.
  2. Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237–259. · DOI
  3. Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 925–945. · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · Paper page
  4. Chen, X. (2011). Visuelle Analyse von Eye-Tracking-daten [Visual analysis of eye-tracking data]. Diplomarbeit [Masters thesis]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-2791 . · doi:10.18419/opus-2791
  5. Chen, Y. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2014). Probing the relationship between process of spatial problems solving and science learning: An eye tracking approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 579–603. · doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9504-y
  6. Chumachenko, D., Shvarts, A., & Budanov, A. (2014). The development of the visual perception of the cartesian coordinate system: An eye tracking study. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 313–320). PME: Vancouver.
  7. de Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1986). Eye-movements of first graders during word problem solving. In International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Ed.), Proceedings of the tenth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (pp. 421–426). London, UK: PME.
  8. de Freitas, E. (2016). Material encounters and media events: What kind of mathematics can a body do? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 185–202. · DOI
  9. Dindyal, J. (2015). Geometry in the early years: A commentary. ZDM, 47(3), 519–529. · doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0700-9
  10. Driver, J., Haggard, P., & Shallice, T. (2007). Introduction. Mental processes in the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 757–760. · DOI
  11. Epelboim, J., & Suppes, P. (2001). A model of eye movements and visual working memory during problem solving in geometry. Vision Research, 41(12), 1561–1574. · DOI
  12. Fry, C. J. (1988). Eye fixations during the reading and solution of word problems containing extraneous information: Relation to spatial visualization ability. In A. Borbas (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth conference of the International Group of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 1, pp. 326–333). Veszprem, Hungary: PME.
  13. Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: Analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163–183. · DOI
  14. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. Gerrig, R. J. (2013). Psychology and life. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  16. Hansen, J. P. (1991). The use of eye mark recordings to support verbal retrospection in software testing. Acta Psychologica, 76(1), 31–49. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: Evidence from eye movements on a blank screen. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1), 1–8.
  18. Hayhoe, M. M. (2004). Advances in relating eye movements and cognition. Infancy, 6(2), 267–274. · DOI
  19. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76–84. · DOI
  20. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford, UK: University Press.
  21. Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In R. Radach, J. Hyona, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 573–605). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kassner, M., Patera, W., & Bulling, A. (2014). Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. arXiv:1405.0006. · arXiv
  25. König, P., Wilming, N., Kietzmann, T. C., Ossandón, J. P., Onat, S., Ehinger, B. V., et al. (2016). Eye movements as a window to cognitive processes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(5), 1–16. · DOI
  26. Lee, W. K., & Wu, C. J. (2018). Eye movements in integrating geometric text and figure: Scanpaths and given-new effects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 699–714. · DOI
  27. Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense. · doi:10.1163/9789087909352_010
  28. Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73–90. · DOI
  29. Lin, J. J. H., & Lin, S. S. (2014a). Tracking eye movements when solving geometry problems with handwriting devices. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7(1), 1–15.
  30. Lin, J. J. H., & Lin, S. S. (2014b). Cognitive load for configuration comprehension in computer-supported geometry problem solving: An eye movement perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 605–627. · DOI
  31. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, Austria: Beltz.
  33. Muldner, K., & Burleston, W. (2015). Utilizing sensor data to model students’ creativity in a digital environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 127–137. · DOI
  34. Obersteiner, A., & Tumpek, C. (2016). Measuring fraction comparison strategies with eye-tracking. ZDM, 48(3), 255–266. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Schindler, M., Joklitschke, J., & Rott, B. (2018). Mathematical creativity and its subdomain-specificity. Investigating the appropriateness of solutions in multiple solution tasks. In M. F. Singer (Ed.), Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness. Enhancing creative capacities in mathematically promising students (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Springer. · DOI
  37. Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2017). Eye-tracking and its domain-specific interpretation. A stimulated recall study on eye movements in geometrical tasks. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 4, pp. 153–160). Singapore: PME.
  38. Shayan, S., Abrahamson, D., Bakker, A., Duijzer, A. C. G., & Van der Schaaf, M. F. (2017). Eye-tracking the emergence of attentional anchors in a mathematics learning tablet activity. In C. Was, F. Sansosti, & B. Morris (Eds.), Eye-tracking technology applications in educational research (pp. 166–194). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. · DOI
  39. Sinclair, N., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: An ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM, 48(5), 691–719. · DOI
  40. Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2017). Eyetracking methodology in SCMC: A tool for empowering learning and teaching. ReCALL, 29(2), 160–177. · DOI

Cited by

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J.
Venue
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-02-06
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
123-139
ISSN
  • 0013-1954
  • 1573-0816
DOI
10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z
Cited by
113
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
Funders
Örebro University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z
The paper
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2019). Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.