Cited by 1,730Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Eye fixations and cognitive processes

Just, Marcel Adam, Carpenter, Patricia A·1976·Cognitive Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Just, Marcel Adam
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
441-480
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985270055
Cited by
1,730
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 41
FWCI
43.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
eye fixations, fixation duration, fixation sequences, mental rotation, sentence verification, quantitative comparison, visual attention, cognitive processing models, eye movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review