Cited by 201Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyClinical practice guidelines implementation

Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them

Papatheodorou, Stefania·2019·European Journal of Epidemiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-019-00505-6

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Umbrella reviews aim to present an overview of findings from systematic reviews, making conclusions reliant on the quality and accuracy of reporting of included reviews and necessarily resulting in some loss of nuance when findings are pooled.

    “First, umbrella reviews aim to present an overview of findings from systematic reviews [282], making conclusions reliant on the quality and accuracy of reporting of included reviews and necessarily resulting in some loss of nuance when findings are pooled.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papatheodorou, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Papatheodorou, Stefania
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2019-03-09
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
543-546
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2921494313
Cited by
201
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
umbrella review, systematic reviews, review methodology, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Epidemiologic Studies, PubMed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review