Cited by 33Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlSilicon Effects in Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preventive and curative activity of postharvest potassium silicate treatments to control green and blue molds on orange fruit

Open access
Moscoso-Ramírez, Pedro A., Palou, Lluís·2014·European Journal of Plant Pathology

Abstract

Preventive and curative antifungal activities of postharvest treatments with potassium silicate (PSi) against green (GM) and blue (BM) molds were evaluated on oranges (cvs. ‘Valencia’ or ‘Lanelate’) artificially inoculated in rind wounds with Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum, respectively. The most effective PSi concentration, the effect of fungal inoculum concentration, and the influence of temporal and spatial factors on antifungal activity were assessed in in vivo primary screenings. After 6 days of incubation at 20 °C, significant preventive (treatment before fungal inoculation) and curative (treatment after inoculation) activities against GM and BM were observed with PSi at 90 mM (GM and BM incidence reductions of 23 and 52 %, and 23 and 40 %, respectively). In preventive tests, the effectiveness of PSi was influenced by inoculum concentration (10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, or 10⁶spores ml⁻¹), but not by the distance between treatment and inoculation sites (10, 20 or 30 mm). PSi applied about 2 h before inoculation showed higher preventive activity than applied before 24, 48 or 96 h. In order to determine the best dip treatment conditions, PSi at 90 mM was tested at 20 or 50 °C for 60 or 150 s in small-scale trials with ‘Lanelate’ oranges artificially inoculated before or after the treatment and incubated for 7 days at 20 °C. Dips at 20 °C for 60 s were selected and subsequently applied on inoculated ‘Valencia’ oranges stored at 5 °C and 90 % RH for up to 6 weeks. Curative postharvest dips effectively reduced the incidence and severity of both GM and BM during cold storage, while preventive dips significantly reduced the severity but not the incidence. Overall, postharvest PSi treatments showed potential as a new tool to be part of non-polluting strategies to control penicillium decay of citrus fruit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10658-013-0345-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bi, Y., Tian, S. P., Guo, Y. R., & Ge, Y. H. (2006). Sodium silicate reduces postharvest decay on Hami melons: Induced resistance and fungistatic effects. Plant Disease, 90, 279–283. · DOI
  2. Buonario, R., Iriti, M., & Romanazzi, G. (2009). Induced resistance to plant diseases caused by oomycetes and fungi. Petria, 19, 130–148.
  3. Chérif, M., Asselin, A., & Bélanger, R. R. (1994). Defense responses induced by soluble silicon in cucumber roots infected by Phytium spp. Phytopathology, 84, 236–242. · DOI
  4. Chérif, M., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J. G., & Bélanger, R. R. (1992a). Silicon induced resistance in cucumber plants against Phytium ultimum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41, 411–425. · DOI
  5. Chérif, M., Menzies, J. G., Benhamou, N., & Bélanger, R. R. (1992b). Studies of silicon distribution in wounded and Phytium ultimum infected cucumbers plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41, 371–385. · DOI
  6. Datnoff, L. E., Seebold, K. W., & Correa, V. F. J. (2001). The use of silicon for integrated disease management: reducing fungicide applications and enhancing host plant resistance. In L. E. Datnoff, G. H. Snyder, & G. H. Korndorfer (Eds.), Silicon in agriculture (pp. 171–183). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. · DOI
  7. Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. L. (2009). Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biology and Technology, 52, 137–145. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eckert, J. W., & Brown, G. E. (1986). Evaluation of postharvest treatments for citrus fruits. In K. D. Hickey (Ed.), Methods for evaluating pesticides for control of plant pathogens (pp. 92–97). St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society Press.
  9. Eckert, J. W., & Eaks, I. L. (1989). Postharvest disorders and diseases of citrus fruits. In W. Reuter, E. C. Calavan, & G. E. Carman (Eds.), The Citrus Industry (Vol. 5, pp. 179–260). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  10. Edreva, A. (2004). A novel strategy for plant protection: Induced resistance. Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology, 3, 61–69.
  11. Epstein, E. (1999). Silicon. Annual Review of Plant Phisiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 641–664. · DOI
  12. Guo, Y., Liu, L., Zhao, J., & Bi, Y. (2007). Use of silicon oxide and sodium silicate for controlling Trichothecium roseum postharvest rot in Chinese cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.). International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42, 1012–1018. · DOI
  13. Laing, M. D., Gatarayiha, M. C., & Adandonon, A. (2006). Silicon use for pest control in agriculture: A review. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, 80, 278–286.
  14. Liu, J., Zong, Y., Qin, G., Li, B., & Tian, S. (2010). Plasma membrane damage contributes to antifungal activity of silicon against Penicillium digitatum. Current Microbiology, 61, 274–279. · DOI
  15. Mathaba, N., Tesfay, S., Bower, J. P., & Bertling, I. (2009). The potential of postharvest silicon dips to mitigate chilling injury in citrus fruit with special emphasis on lemon (c.v Eureka). In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Research Day, Silicon in Agriculture. Durban: South African Sugar Association.
  16. Moscoso-Ramírez, P. A., & Palou, L. (2013). Evaluation of postharvest treatments with chemical resistance inducers to control green and blue molds on orange fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 85, 132–135. · DOI
  17. O’Neill, T. M. (1991). Investigation of glasshouse structure, growing medium and silicon nutrition as factors affecting disease incidence in cucumber crops. Medelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, 56, 359–367.
  18. Palou, L., Smilanick, J. L., & Droby, S. (2008). Alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of citrus postharvest green and blue molds. Stewart Postharvest Review, 2(2), 1–16. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Porat, R., Vinokur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldshmidt, E. E., et al. (2003). Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum in grapefruit by β-aminobutyric acid. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 109, 901–907. · DOI
  20. Samuels, A. L., Glass, A. D. M., Ehret, D. L., & Menzies, J. G. (1991). Mobility and deposition of silicon in cucumber plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 14, 485–492. · DOI
  21. Shen, G. H., Xue, Q. H., Tang, M., Chen, Q., Wang, L. N., Duan, C. M., et al. (2010). Inhibitory effects of potassium silicate on five soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi in vitro. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 117, 180–184. · DOI
  22. Tian, S., Qin, G., & Xu, Y. (2005). Synergistic effects of combining biocontrol agents with silicon against postharvest diseases of jujube fruit. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 544–550. · DOI
  23. USDA AMS NOP. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program. (2010). 7 CFR 205.601. Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. Final rule. Federal Register, 75(238), 77521–77524.
  24. US EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2006). 40 CFR 180.1268. Potassium silicate; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Final rule. Federal Register, 71(114), 34267–34272.
  25. Vallad, G. E., & Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 44, 1920–1934. · DOI
  26. Wagner, F. (1940). Die bedeutung der kieselsaüre für das wachstun einiger kulturpflanzen ihren nährstoffhaushalt und ihre anfälligkeit gegen echte mehltaupilze. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 12, 427–479.
  27. Youssef, K., Ligorio, A., Sanzani, S. M., Nigro, F., & Ippolito, A. (2012). Control of storage diseases of citrus by pre- and postharvest application of salts. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 72, 57–63. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Moscoso-Ramírez, P. A., & Palou, L.
Affiliations
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Plant Pathology
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
138
Issue
4
Pages
721-732
ISSN
  • 0929-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8469
OpenAlex
W2007797486
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Journal of Plant Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Redivia (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Silicon Effects in Agriculture
Keywords
potassium silicate, postharvest treatment, green mold, blue mold, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, orange fruit, Valencia orange, prophylaxis, curative treatment, dip treatment, cold storage, postharvest decay control, antifungal activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventive and curative activity of postharvest potassium silicate treatments to control green and blue molds on orange fruit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10658-013-0345-x
The paper
Moscoso-Ramírez, P. A., & Palou, L. (2014). Preventive and curative activity of postharvest potassium silicate treatments to control green and blue molds on orange fruit. European Journal of Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-013-0345-x