CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defluoridation of water using autochthonous bacterial isolates

Sharma, Sonika, Upadhyay, Dhwani, Singh, Bhupendra, Shrivastava, Divya, Kulshreshtha, Niha Mohan·2019·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Prolonged consumption of fluoride-contaminated water poses health problems like dental and skeletal fluorosis in many parts of the world including India. In regions with acute water scarcity, it demands immediate intervention like de-fluoridation of water before consumption. In the current study, fluoride-resistant bacteria were isolated from fluoride-contaminated groundwater and soil samples collected from Dungarpur district, India, for their potential use in defluoridation. Out of a total of 53 bacterial isolates that were recovered and screened for fluoride resistance, three highly fluoride-resistant isolates DWC1, DWC2 and DWB5, resistant to up to 9200 mg L -1 , 7200 mg L -1 and 5200 mg L -1 fluoride respectively, were characterized and identified as Aeromonas sp., Brevibacterium sp. and Paenibacillus sp. respectively. The fluoride removal capacity of isolates DWC1, DWC2, DWB5 and a consortium of all the three isolates was found to be 68.7%, 73.4%, 76.7 % and 70.1% respectively on nutrient broth supplemented with NaF (2000 mg L -1 ) after 8 days of incubation. Defluoridation conditions for the strain showing the best result (Paenibacillus sp.) were optimized for real fluoride-rich water collected from Ajmer District, India, using the Taguchi design of experiment. A defluoridation of up to 73.3% was observed at 40 °C temperature and pH 8 with inoculum: water ratio of 2:1 after 8 days of incubation. To the best of our knowledge, the defluoridation capacity of Paenibacillus…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Agarwal, V., Vaish, A. K., & Vaish, P. (1997). Groundwater quality: focus on fluoride and fluorosis in Rajasthan. Current Science, 73(99), 743–746.
  2. Ajisha, M. A. T., & Rajagopal, K. (2015). Fluoride removal study using pyrolyzed Delonix regia pod, an unconventional adsorbent. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 223–236. · DOI
  3. APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 21 st edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association/Water Environment Federation.
  4. Banerjee, G., Sengupta, A., Roy, T., Banerjee, P. P., Chattopadhyay, A., Ray, A. K., et al. (2016). Isolation and characterization of fluoride-resistant bacterial strains from fluoride endemic areas of West Bengal, India: assessment of their fluoride absorption efficiency. Research Report Fluoride, 49(4 Pt 1), 429–440.
  5. Chouhan, S., Lomash, V., & Flora, S. J. S. (2010). Fluoride-induced changes in haem biosynthesis pathway, neurological variables and tissue histopathology of rats. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 30(1), 63–73. · DOI
  6. Chouhan, S., Tuteja, U., & Flora, S. J. S. (2012). Isolation, identification and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria: possible role in bioremediation. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 48(1), 43–50. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chun, J., Lee, J. H., Jung, Y., Kim, M., Kim, S., Kim, B. K., et al. (2007). EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57(10), 2259–2261. · DOI
  8. Dobaradaran, S., Ali Zazuli, M., Keshtkar, M., Noshadi, S., Khorsand, M., Faraji Ghasemi, F., et al. (2016). Biosorption of fluoride from aqueous phase onto Padina sanctae crucis algae: evaluation of biosorption kinetics and isotherms. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(58), 28405–28416. · DOI
  9. Dwivedi, S., Mondal, P., & Balomajumder, C. (2016). Bioremoval of fluoride from synthetic water using gram-negative bacteria Shewanella putrefaciens. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste, 21(2), 1–6.
  10. Edwards, U., Rogall, T., Blocker, H., Emde, M., & Bottger, E. C. (1989). Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 17(19), 7843–7853. · DOI
  11. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39(4), 783–791. · DOI
  12. Haritha, D., & Naphade-Mahajan, S. (2016). Isolation, identification and molecular characterization of fluoride tolerating bacteria. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(8), 288–292.
  13. Hussain, J., Hussain, I., & Sharma, K. C. (2010). Fluoride and health hazards: community perception in a fluorotic area of central Rajasthan (India): an arid environment. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 162(1-4), 1–14. · DOI
  14. Jadhav, S. V., Bringas, E., Yadav, G. D., Rathod, V. K., Ortiz, I., & Marathe, K. V. (2015). Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: a review of current technologies for contaminants removal. Journal of Environmental Management, 162, 306–325. · DOI
  15. Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16(2), 111–120. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Li, S., Smith, K. D., Davis, J. H., Gordon, P. B., Breaker, R. R., & Strobel, S. A. (2013). Eukaryotic resistance to fluoride toxicity mediated by a widespread family of fluoride export proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(47), 19018–19023. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mohammad, A., & Majumder, C. B. (2014). Removal of fluoride from synthetic waste water by using “bio-adsorbents”. International Journal of Research Engineering Technology, 3(4), 776–785. · DOI
  18. Mondal, P., & George, S. (2015). A review on adsorbents used for defluoridation of drinking water. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 14(2), 195–210. · DOI
  19. Mukherjee, S., Yadav, V., Mondal, M., Banerjee, S., & Halder, G. (2015). Characterization of a fluoride-resistant bacterium Acinetobacter sp. RH5 towards assessment of its defluoridation capability. Applied Water Science, 7, 1923–1930. · DOI
  20. Mukherjee, S., Sahu, P., & Halder, G. (2017). Microbial remediation of fluoride-contaminated water via a novel bacterium Providencia vermicola (KX926492). Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 413–423. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mukherjee, S., Sahu, P., & Halder, G. (2018). Comparative assessment of the fluoride removal capability of immobilized and dead cells of Staphylococcus lentus (KX941098) isolated from contaminated groundwater. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 37(5), 1573–1586. · DOI
  22. Murtey, M. D., & Ramasamy, P. (2016). Sample preparations for scanning electron microscopy–life sciences, Modern Electron Microscopy in Physical and Life Sciences. Milos Janecek and Robert Kral, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/61720. · DOI
  23. Pal, K. C., Mondal, N. K., Chatterjee, S., Ghosh, T. H., & Datta, J. K. (2014). Characterization of fluoride-tolerant halophilic Bacillus flexus NM25 (HQ875778) isolated from fluoride-affected soil in Birbhum District, West Bengal, India. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 186(2), 699–709. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pelczar, M. J., Bard, R. C., Burnett, G. W., Conn, H. J., Demoss, R. D., & Euans, E. E. (1957). Manual of microbiological methods (p. 315). New York: Society of American Bacteriology, McGraw Hill Book Company.
  25. Piddennavar, R., & Krishnappa, P. (2013). Review on defluoridation techniques of water. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2(3), 86–94.
  26. Ranjit, R. (2001). Design of experiment using the Taguchi approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc..
  27. Sánchez-Sánchez, H. A., Cortés-Martínez, R., & Alfaro-Cuevas-Villanueva, R. (2013). Fluoride removal from aqueous solutions by mechanically modified guava seeds. International Journal of Science Basic Application Research, 11(1), 159–172.
  28. Saxena, V. K., & Ahmed, S. (2003). Inferring the chemical parameters for the dissolution of fluoride in groundwater. Environmental Geology, 43(6), 731–736. · DOI
  29. Sneath, P. H. A., Mair, N. S., Sharpe, M. E., & Hotts, J. G. (1986). Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (Vol. 2). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
  30. Sneha, J., Yenkie, M. K., Labhsetwar, N., & Rayalu, S. (2012). Fluoride in drinking water and defluoridation of water. Chemical Reviews, 112, 2454–2466. · DOI
  31. Soni, R., & Modi, S. (2013). A review on effect of fluoride on human health in Rajasthan. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2(4), 638–646.
  32. Sree, K. K., Raja, C. E., & Ramesh, U. (2018). Isolation and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria from ground waters in Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India. Environmental Research and Technology, 1(2), 69–74.
  33. Strunecka, A., & Patocka, J. (1999). Pharmacological and toxicological effects of aluminofluoride complexes. Fluoride, 32(4), 230–242.
  34. Suneetha, N., Rupa, K. P., Sabitha, V., Kumar, K. K., Mohanty, S., Kanagasabapathy, A. S., & Rao, P. (2008). Defluoridation of water by a one step modification of the Nalgonda technique. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 1(2), 56–58. · DOI
  35. Suneetha, M., Syamasundar, B., & Ravindranath, K. (2015). Groundwater pollution and adverse effects on health by fluoride ions. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceuticals Research, 7(11), 292–305.
  36. Susheela, A. K. (1999). Fluorosis management programme in India. Current Science, 77(10), 1250–1256.
  37. Sutton, R. W., Bender, G. R., & Marquis, R. E. (1987). Fluoride inhibition of proton-translocating ATPases of oral bacteria. Infection and Immunity, 55(11), 2597–2603. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Taguchi, G. (1987). System of experimental design. New York: UNIPUB Kraus International Publications.
  39. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007). MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596–1599. · DOI
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). (1997). surveillance and control of community supplies Geneva. In Guidelines for drinking water quality (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., p. 113).
  41. Yadav, K. K., Gupta, N., Kumar, V., Khan, S. A., & Kumar, A. (2018). A review of emerging adsorbents and current demand for defluoridation of water: bright future in water sustainability. Environment International, 111, 80–108. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, S., Upadhyay, D., Singh, B., Shrivastava, D., & Kulshreshtha, N. M.
ORCID
Kulshreshtha, Niha Mohan
Venue
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-11-30
Volume
191
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0167-6369
  • 1573-2959
DOI
10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8
Cited by
15
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defluoridation of water using autochthonous bacterial isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8
The paper
Sharma, S., Upadhyay, D., Singh, B., Shrivastava, D., & Kulshreshtha, N. M. (2019). Defluoridation of water using autochthonous bacterial isolates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8