Cited by 359Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicyQuality of Life MeasurementMulti-Criteria Decision Making

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework

Munda, Giuseppe·2005·Environment, Development and Sustainability

DOI 10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Fuzzy sets
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Fuzzy sets
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,960
Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth
Bazan, G. (1997) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g31710273 · Cited by 4,693
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Carlsson, C. P. O., & Zelený, M. (1983) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2580902 · Cited by 2,461
For The Common Good: Redirecting The Economy Towards Community, The Environment And A Sustainable Future
Daly, H. E., Cobb, J. B., & Cobb, C. W. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,649
Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1 · Cited by 1,575
Human Appropriation of the Products of Photosynthesis
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Matson, P. A. (1986) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310258 · Cited by 1,505
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
Roy, B. (1996) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1 · Cited by 1,350
From substantive to procedural rationality
Simon, H. A. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7_6 · Cited by 1,315
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
French, S. D. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600981 · Cited by 1,285

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

G. Barbiroli, 1993, Direct and indirect indicators of sustainable development, 489
E. Beinat, 1998, Multicriteria Evaluation in Land-Use Management: Methodologies and Case Studies
R. Horwarth, 1992, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings., 80, 473
Munda, G. and Nardo, M. (2003). On the methodological foundations of composite indicators for ranking countries’). Proceedings of the First OECD/JRC Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance, Ispra, JRC, available at http://webfarm.jrc.cec.eu.int/uasa/events/oecd_12 may 03/background/.
M. Saisana, 2002, State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, EUR 20408 EN, Report European Commission
H.A. Simon, 1976, Methods and Appraisal in Economics.
P.L. Yu, 1985, Multi Criteria Decision Making: Concepts, Techniques and Extensions

Sorted by citations

On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 · Cited by 1,325
“…at the beginning of the previous section, the interpretation of the weights could be twofold: ‘trade-offs’ or ‘importance coefficients’.20 The choice of the proper annotation, though, essentially boils down to the choice of the proper aggregation method (Munda 2005a, p. 118; OECD 2008, p. 33).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators
Gan, X., Fernández, I. C., Guo, J., Wilson, M. C., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., & Wu, J. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068 · Cited by 667
Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators
Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Sanchez-Fernandez, G. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.027 · Cited by 424
Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions
Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023 · Cited by 379
Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review
Dı́az-Balteiro, L., González‐Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075 · Cited by 328
A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.020 · Cited by 325
Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development
Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2009) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.10.001 · Cited by 312
Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.018 · Cited by 277
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Munda, G. (2006) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review
Gibari, S. E., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2018) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-018-0902-z · Cited by 256
Measuring the environmental sustainability performance of global supply chains: A multi-regional input-output analysis for carbon, sulphur oxide and water footprints
Acquaye, A. A., Feng, K., Oppon, E., Salhi, S., Ibn‐Mohammed, T., Genovese, A., & Hubacek, K. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.059 · Cited by 247
Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Zhou, D. Q. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9472-3 · Cited by 240
A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators
Hatefi, S. M., & Torabi, S. A. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.014 · Cited by 213
Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia
Sun, H., Mohsin, M., Alharthi, M., & Abbas, Q. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519 · Cited by 186
Navigating uncertainty in environmental composite indicators
Burgass, M. J., Halpern, B. S., Nicholson, E., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.034 · Cited by 176
Comparing MCDA Aggregation Methods in Constructing Composite Indicators Using the Shannon-Spearman Measure
Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9338-0 · Cited by 160
An Index for Assessing Demographic Inequalities in Cumulative Environmental Hazards with Application to Los Angeles, California
Su, J. G., Morello-Frosch, R. A., Jesdale, B. M., Kyle, A. D., Shamasunder, B., & Jerrett, M. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901041p · Cited by 146
Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation
Bao, Q., Ruan, D., Shen, Y., Hermans, E., & Janssens, D. (2011) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.08.014 · Cited by 143
Exergy as a global energy sustainability indicator. A review of the state of the art
Romero, J. C., & Linares, P. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.012 · Cited by 140
Goal programming synthetic indicators: An application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties
Peral, F. J. B., Caballero, R., González, M., Lozano-Oyola, M., & García, F. P. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.016 · Cited by 138
Assessment of sustainability indicators for green building manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach
Yadegaridehkordi, E., Hourmand, M., Nilashi, M., Alsolami, E., Samad, S., Mahmoud, M., Alarood, A. A., Zainol, A., Majeed, H. D., & Shuib, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122905 · Cited by 136
Incorporating sustainable development in the design of mineral processing operations – Review and analysis of current approaches
McLellan, B. C., Corder, G. D., Giurco, D., & Green, S. R. (2009) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.003 · Cited by 129
Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework
Miller, H. J., Witlox, F., & Tribby, C. P. (2012) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.007 · Cited by 127
Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems
Lai, E., Lundie, S., & Ashbolt, N. J. (2008) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/15730620802041038 · Cited by 122
Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives. A case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga)
Paneque, P., Quintana, S. C., Pereira, Â. G., Ituarte, L. D. M., & Mateos, B. P. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.008 · Cited by 117
Alternative approaches to the construction of a composite indicator of agricultural sustainability: An application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain
Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Riesgo, L. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.023 · Cited by 117
AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF LITHUANIAN ECONOMIC SECTORS BASED ON FINANCIAL RATIOS AND FUZZY MCDM METHODS
Baležentis, А., Baležentis, T., & Misiūnas, A. (2012) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/20294913.2012.656151 · Cited by 106
A Process Oriented MCDM Approach to Construct a Circular Economy Composite Index
Garcı́a-Bernabeu, A., Hilario-Caballero, A., Plà-Santamaria, D., & Molina, F. S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020618 · Cited by 105
Dynamic multidimensional assessment of sustainability at the macro level: The case of Austria
Shmelev, S., & Rodríguez‐Labajos, B. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.019 · Cited by 105
Water Security Assessment: Integrating Governance and Freshwater Indicators
Norman, E. S., Dunn, G., Bakker, K., Allen, D. M., & de Albuquerque, R. C. (2012) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0200-4 · Cited by 102
Assessing sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A methodologically focused literature review
Lindfors, A. (2021) · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.indic.2021.100149 · Cited by 126
How sustainable is the nitrogen management in Brazil? A sustainability assessment using the Entropy Weight Method
Cunha‐Zeri, G., Guidolini, J. F., Branco, E. A., & Ometto, J. P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115330 · Cited by 101
An indicator framework for quantifying the sustainability of concrete materials from the perspectives of global sustainable development
Opon, J., & Henry, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.220 · Cited by 99
Leveraging Big Data for the Development of Transport Sustainability Indicators
Cottrill, C., & Derrible, S. (2015) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.942094 · Cited by 99
Environmental sustainability benchmarking of the U.S. and Canada metropoles: An expert judgment-based multi-criteria decision making approach
Eğilmez, G., Gümüş, S., & Küçükvar, M. (2014) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.006 · Cited by 94
Measuring Social Sustainability: A Community-Centred Approach
Magee, L., Scerri, A., & James, P. (2012) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-012-9166-x · Cited by 93
Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin
Becchio, C., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S. P., & Dell’Anna, F. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.048 · Cited by 91
Mediterranean landscapes under change: Combining social multicriteria evaluation and the ecosystem services framework for land use planning
Martínez‐Sastre, R., Ravera, F., González, J. A., López, C. A., Bidegain, Í., & Munda, G. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.001 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability
Ellili, N. O. D. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03067-6 · Cited by 92
Data aggregation in constructing composite indicators: A perspective of information loss
Zhou, P., Fan, L., & Zhou, D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.039 · Cited by 89
Building a Composite Indicator to Measure Environmental Sustainability Using Alternative Weighting Methods
Gómez-Limón, J. A., Arriaza, M., & Guerrero-Baena, M. D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114398 · Cited by 88
The use, non-use and misuse of indicators in sustainability assessment and communication
Lyytimäki, J. M., Tapio, P., Varho, V., & Söderman, T. (2013) · International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology · doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.834524 · Cited by 80
Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites Part 2: Ranking of potentially contaminated sites
Pizzol, L., Critto, A., Agostini, P., & Marcomini, A. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.010 · Cited by 79
Developing sustainability indicators – The need for radical transparency
Reid, J. D., & Rout, M. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105941 · Cited by 78
Comparison of municipalities considering environmental sustainability via neutrosophic DEMATEL based TOPSIS
Kılıç, H. S., & Yalcin, A. S. (2020) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2020.100827 · Cited by 78
A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assessment during design for manufacturing
Eastwood, M. D., & Haapala, K. R. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.105 · Cited by 78
Exploring the relationship between water-energy-food nexus sustainability and multiple ecosystem services at the urban agglomeration scale
Ding, T., Fang, L., Chen, J., Ji, J., & Fang, Z. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.028 · Cited by 77
Sustainability assessment of tertiary wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria analysis
Plakas, K. V., Georgiadis, A.-L., & Karabelas, A. J. (2015) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2015.630 · Cited by 80
A mixed methods approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China
Berta, M., Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2016) · Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science · doi:10.1177/0265813516669139 · Cited by 77
Towards a generic multi-criteria evaluation model for low carbon cities
Azizalrahman, H., & Hasyimi, V. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.026 · Cited by 76
Constructing the FEEM sustainability index: A Choquet integral application
Pinar, M., Cruciani, C., Giove, S., & Sostero, M. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.012 · Cited by 79
Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI)
Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., & Torre, C. M. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.064 · Cited by 73
Towards Strong Sustainability Management—A Generalized PROSA Method
Ziemba, P. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061555 · Cited by 70
Assessment of sustainability using multi-grade fuzzy approach
Vinodh, S. (2010) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-010-0333-1 · Cited by 69
Development of decision support system for sustainability evaluation: a case study
Vinodh, S., Kandasamy, J., Kumar, V., & Dutta, R. (2013) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0613-7 · Cited by 69
Assessing the sustainability of Irish agriculture
Dillon, E., Hennessy, T., & Hynes, S. (2010) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.3763/ijas.2009.0044 · Cited by 68
Multidimensional sustainability benchmarking for smart megacities
Shmelev, S., & Александровна, Ш. И. (2019) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.015 · Cited by 67
Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
Wolfslehner, B., & Seidl, R. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5 · Cited by 66
A sustainable city index for Malaysia
Choon, S.-W., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., Jemain, A. A., Hashim, H. S., & Hadi, A. S. (2011) · International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology · doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.543012 · Cited by 64
The sustainability of China's major mining cities
Yu, J. S., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2007) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.10.001 · Cited by 61
Exploring sustainable farming scenarios at a regional scale: an application to dairy farms in Brittany
Alba, I. A., López‐Ridaura, S., van der Werf, H. M. G., Leterme, P., & Corson, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.061 · Cited by 56
Colombian agriculture under multiple exposures: a review and research agenda
Feola, G., Vanegas, L. A. A., & Bamón, B. P. C. (2014) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2014.934776 · Cited by 55
Rice farming sustainability assessment in Bangladesh
Roy, R., Chan, N. W., & Rainis, R. (2014) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0234-4 · Cited by 51
Assessment of Latin American sustainability
Toumi, O., Gallo, J. L., & Rejeb, J. B. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.013 · Cited by 51
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Munda, G. (2016) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_27 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
A multi-criteria approach to assess interconnections among the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of circular economy
dos Santos, L. C. T., Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., Liu, G., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118317 · Cited by 48
Emerging Battery Technologies to Boost the Clean Energy Transition
Passerini, S., Barelli, L., Baumann, M., Peters, J. F., & Weil, M. (2024) · The Materials Research Society series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48359-2 · Cited by 58
Ecological deficit and use of natural capital in Luxembourg from 1995 to 2009
Rugani, B., Roviani, D., Hild, P., Schmitt, B., & Benetto, E. (2013) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.122 · Cited by 49
A novel comprehensive model of set pair analysis with extenics for river health evaluation and prediction of semi-arid basin - A case study of Wei River Basin, China
Wan, X., Yang, T., Zhang, Q., Yan, X., Hu, C., Sun, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145845 · Cited by 47
The sweet spot in sustainability: a framework for corporate assessment in sugar manufacturing
Sureeyatanapas, P., Yang, J., & Bamford, D. (2015) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2015.1015470 · Cited by 47
Managing trade-offs in complex scenarios: A decision-making tool for sustainability projects
de Magalhães, R. F., Danilevicz, Â. D. M. F., & Palazzo, J. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.023 · Cited by 47
Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study
Roszkowska, E., & Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2019) · Central European Journal of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10100-019-00641-0 · Cited by 46
An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development
Szabó, Z. K., Szádoczki, Z., Bozóki, S., Stănciulescu, G., & Szabo, D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042254 · Cited by 46
An Integrated Assessment Approach as a Decision Support System for Urban Planning and Urban Regeneration Policies
Spina, L. D., Lorè, I., Scrivo, R., & Viglianisi, A. (2017) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings7040085 · Cited by 45
Constructing a composite indicator with multiplicative aggregation under the objective of ranking alternatives
Blancas, F. J., Contreras, I., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2013) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2012.90 · Cited by 45
Assessment of Environmental Sustainability in Health Care Organizations
Carnero, M. C. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7078270 · Cited by 45
Sustainability assessment in manufacturing organizations
Sangwan, K. S., Bhakar, V., & Digalwar, A. K. (2018) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-08-2017-0227 · Cited by 45
Mines, Wines and Thoroughbreds: Towards Regional Sustainability in the Upper Hunter, Australia
McManus, P. (2008) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400701827394 · Cited by 44
Beyond “beyond GDP indicators:” The need for reflexivity in science for governance
Kovacic, Z., & Giampietro, M. (2015) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.11.007 · Cited by 44
Combining indicators for decision making in planning issues: A theoretical approach to perform sustainability assessment
Hély, V., & Antoni, J. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.035 · Cited by 44
Comparing region-specific sustainability assessments through indicator systems: Feasible or not?
van Zeijl‐Rozema, A., Ferraguto, L., & Caratti, P. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.025 · Cited by 42
Multicriteria analysis for benchmarking sustainability development
Deng, H. (2015) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-07-2013-0072 · Cited by 41
Planning regional sustainability: An index-based framework to assess spatial plans. Application to the region of Cantabria (Spain)
Nogués, S., González-González, E., & Cordera, R. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.328 · Cited by 41
Associations between forest characteristics and socio-economic development: A case study from Portugal
Ribeiro, S. M. C., & Lovett, A. A. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.014 · Cited by 41
Full consistency method (FUCOM) and weighted sum under fuzzy information for evaluating the sustainability of farm tourism sites
Ocampo, L. A. (2022) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-022-07184-8 · Cited by 42
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grassland Ecosystems of the Central Lithuania: Multi-Criteria Evaluation on a Basis of the ARAS Method
Baležentienė, L., & Kusta, A. (2012) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/2012/908384 · Cited by 40
Multicriteria Decision Model to Support the Assignment of Storage Location of Products in a Warehouse
da Silva, D. D., de Vasconcelos, N. V. C., & Cavalcante, C. A. V. (2015) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2015/481950 · Cited by 39
A socio-technical approach to the assessment of sustainable tourism: Adding value with a comprehensive process-oriented framework
Estêvão, R. S. G., Ferreira, F. A. F., Rosa, Á. A., Govindan, K., & Meidutė‐Kavaliauskienė, I. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.318 · Cited by 39
Measuring Sustainable Development Using an Extended Hellwig Method: A Case Study of Education
Roszkowska, E., & Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2020) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02491-9 · Cited by 43
Multi-Period Multi-Criteria Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Renewable Energy Transition Case from Germany
Witt, T., & Klumpp, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116300 · Cited by 38
Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies
Etxano, I., & Villalba‐Eguiluz, U. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107131 · Cited by 48
Using the five sectors sustainability model to verify the relationship between circularity and sustainability
dos Santos, L. C. T., Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132890 · Cited by 38
Landscape Approaches to Achieving Food Production, Natural Resource Conservation, and the Millennium Development Goals
Milder, J. C., Buck, L., DeClerck, F., & Scherr, S. J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0633-5_5 · Cited by 37
GIS-Based Emotional Computing: A Review of Quantitative Approaches to Measure the Emotion Layer of Human–Environment Relationships
Huang, Y., Fei, T., Kwan, M., Kang, Y., Li, J., Li, Y., Li, X., & Bian, M. (2020) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi9090551 · Cited by 39
Managing sustainable development through goal programming model and satisfaction functions
Nechi, S., Aouni, B., & Mrabet, Z. (2019) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03139-9 · Cited by 37
Sigma-Mu efficiency analysis: A methodology for evaluating units through composite indicators
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.012 · Cited by 37
Una revisión crítica para la construcción de indicadores sintéticos
Serrano, M. D., Peral, F. J. B., Casas, F. M. G., & Lozano, M. G. (2011) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 36
Dynamic sustainability assessment: The case of Russia in the period of transition (1985–2008)
Shmelev, S. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.003 · Cited by 36
Multi–Objective Optimization of Well–Being in the Eu-Ropean Union Member STATES
Balešentis, T., Balešentis, A., & Brauers, W. K. (2011) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2011.11517485 · Cited by 36
Rank aggregation methods dealing with ordinal uncertain preferences
Dopazo, E., & Martínez-Céspedes, M. L. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.051 · Cited by 34

Authors: Munda, G.
Affiliations: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author: Munda, Giuseppe
ORCID: Munda, Giuseppe
Venue: Environment, Development and Sustainability
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2005-01
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-134
ISSN: 1387-585X (ISSN-L)
1573-2975
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0
OpenAlex: W1994748731
Cited by: 358
References: 50
Citations by year: 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI: 31.49
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Environment Development and Sustainability (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Generalitat de Catalunya
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords: sustainability measurement, sustainability assessment, multi-criteria decision making, sustainability indicators, indicator aggregation, economic growth and environmental degradation, regional economic sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks