Cited by 21COVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Reflections on the impact of “flatten the curve” on interdependent workforce sectors

Open access
Santos, Joost·2020·Environment Systems and Decisions

Abstract

The expression "flatten the curve" has gained significant attention in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. The idea is to decrease and/or delay the peak of an epidemic wave so as not to strain or exceed the capacity of healthcare systems. There has been an increasing number of policy recommendations across the globe that favor the use of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to flatten the curve. NPIs encompass containment, suppression, and mitigation measures such as quarantine, travel restrictions, and business closures. This paper provides perspectives on the impact of containment, suppression, and mitigation measures on interdependent workforce sectors. Reflections on the trade-offs between flattening the curve versus personal liberty and socioeconomic disparities are also presented in this paper.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10669-020-09774-z

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A March 2020 study found that BVI users more often rely on information channels that summarize information rather than those that provide direct access to the data.

    “one of the fndings revealed that BVI users more often rely on information channels that summarize information (e.g., summaries provided by news anchors or sighted relatives) rather than those that provide direct access to the data.”

    From The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19 (2023) · cites this paper as [98]

    The paper’s sections on pandemic interventions and workforce disruptions discuss COVID-19 measures and economic effects, not how BVI users obtain information. Searches for BVI users, summarized information channels, and direct access to data found no passage addressing the claimed March 2020 finding. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santos, J.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Santos, Joost
Venue
Environment Systems and Decisions
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
185-188
ISSN
  • 0251-1088 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5403
  • 2194-5411
OpenAlex
W3025145884
Cited by
21
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment Systems & Decisions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1832635)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
flattening the curve, COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions, containment measures, mitigation measures, health system capacity, individual liberty, socioeconomic disparities, business closures, quarantine, travel restrictions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review