Risk and resilience in the time of the COVID-19 crisis
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complex effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being.
“These complex effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being, which included the physical and emotional stress of clinical work, the personal risk of infection and its complications, and personal bereavements and other losses (59–61).”
From Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bouncing forward: a resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks
Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I. (2020) · Environment Systems and Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationGolan, M. S., Jernegan, L. H., & Linkov, I. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09777-w · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Science and Practice of Resilience
Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019) · Risk, systems and decisions · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04565-4 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationPrideaux, ·. F., Quigley, M. C., Attanayake, J., & King, A. D. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09772-1 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Jovanovic, A. S., Klimek, P., Renn, O., et al. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09779-8 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
COVID, resilience, and the built environment
Keenan, J. M. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09773-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Lessons from the past, policies for the future: resilience and sustainability in past crises
Haldon, J., Eisenberg, M., Mordechai, L., et al. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09778-9 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Menoni, S., & Schwarze, R. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09775-y · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Reflections on the impact of “flatten the curve” on interdependent workforce sectors
Santos, J. (2020) · Environment Systems and Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09774-z · Cited by 21 · see citing works
An Analytical Perspective on Pandemic Recovery
Trump, B. D., Bridges, T. S., Cegan, J. C., et al. (2020) · Health Security · doi:10.1089/hs.2020.0057 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationMérad, M., & Trump, B. D. (2019) · Risk, systems and decisions · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20532-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationBiosecurity Demands Resilience
Trump, B. D., Keisler, J. M., Volk, K. M., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00607 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationUnprecedented economic attack on Sub-Sahara African economies: coronavirus
Ndiili, N. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09780-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhalgh, T., Rosen, R., Shaw, S. E., Byng, R., Faulkner, S., Finlay, T., Grundy, E., Husain, L., Hughes, G., Leone, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“…effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being, which included the physical and emotional stress of clinical work, the personal risk of infection and its complications, and personal bereavements and other losses (59–61).”
Background
- Authors
- Trump, B. D., & Linkov, I.
- Affiliations
- United States Army Corps of Engineers (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trump, Benjamin D.
- Venue
- Environment Systems and Decisions
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-173
- ISSN
- 0251-1088 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5403
- 2194-5411
- PMC
- PMC7298688
- OpenAlex
- W3036303374
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environment Systems & Decisions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, risk, resilience, pandemic response, environmental decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
