Cited by 626Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Bouncing forward: a resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks

Open access
Hynes, William, Trump, Benjamin, Love, Patrick, Linkov, Igor·2020·Environment Systems and Decisions

Abstract

Policy questions are often framed in popular discussion as situations where pulling the right levers will get the economy and society back on track after shocks and crises. This approach ignores how systems interact and how their systemic properties shape socioeconomic outcomes, leading to an over-emphasis on a limited set of characteristics, notably efficiency. We argue that this emphasis on efficiency in the operation, management and outcomes of various economic and social systems is not a conscious collective choice, but rather the response of the whole system to the incentives that individual components face. This has brought much of the world to rely upon complex, nested, and interconnected systems to deliver goods and services around the globe. While this approach has many benefits, the Covid-19 crisis shows how it has also reduced the resilience of key systems to shocks, and allowed failures to cascade from one system to others. This paper reviews the impact of COVID-19 on socioeconomic systems, discusses the notion of resilience, and provides specific recommendations on both integrating resilience analytics for recovery from the current crisis as well as on building resilient infrastructure to address future systemic challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Aubin JP Une approche viabiliste du couplage des systèmes climatique et économique Nat Sci Soc 2010 18 277 286 10.1051/nss/2010035 · DOI
  2. Epstein J Agent_Zero: toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science 2014 Trenton Princeton University Press
  3. Ferguson NM et al. (2020) Preprint at Spiral 10.25561/77482 · DOI
  4. Ganin AA Kitsak M Marchese D Keisler JM Seager T Linkov I Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks Sci Adv 2017 3 12 e1701079 10.1126/sciadv.1701079 29291243 PMC5744464 · DOI
  5. Ganin AA Operational resilience: concepts, design and analysis Sci Rep 2016 6 19540 10.1038/srep19540 26782180 PMC4726063 · DOI
  6. Golan MS, Jernegan LH, Linkov I (2020) Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID pandemic. Environment, Systems and Decisions. PMC7261049 32837820
  7. Haldane, Andrew G. (2009) Rethinking the financial network. BIS Review, https://www.bis.org/review/r090505e.pdf
  8. Systemic risks in society and economics. In: Social self-organization, Springer, Berlin
  9. Linkov I Trump BD Poinsatte-Jones K Love P Hynes W Ramos G Resilience at OECD: current state and future directions IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 2018 46 4 128 135 10.1109/EMR.2018.2878006 · DOI
  10. Linkov I Trump BD The science and practice of resilience 2019 Berlin Springer
  11. Linkov I Trump BD Keisler J Risk and resilience must be independently managed Nature 2018 555 7694 30 30 10.1038/d41586-018-02567-0 29493599 · DOI
  12. Michel-Kerjan E How resilient is your country? Nat News 2012 491 7425 497 10.1038/491497a 23172178 · DOI
  13. Juttner U Maklan S Supply chain resilience in the global € financial crisis: an empirical study Supply Chain Manag 2011 16 4 246 259 10.1108/13598541111139062 · DOI
  14. Massaro E Ganin A Perra N Linkov I Vespignani A Resilience management during large-scale epidemic outbreaks Nat Sci Rep. 2018 8 1859 10.1038/s41598-018-19706-2 PMC5789872 29382870 · DOI
  15. Merad M Trump BD Expertise under scrutiny 2020 New York Springer International Publishing
  16. Schelling T Hedström P Swedberg R Social mechanisms and social dynamics Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory 1999 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 32 44
  17. Trump BD, Bridges T, Cegan J, Cibulsky S, Greer S, Jarman J, Lafferty B, Surette M, Linkov I (2020) An analytical perspective on pandemic recovery. Health Security. 32525747
  18. Trump B Keisler J Volk K Linkov I Biosecurity demands resilience Environ Sci Technol 2020 54 4706 4708 10.1021/acs.est.0c00607 32223156 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I.
Affiliations
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
Corresponding author
Linkov, Igor
Venue
Environment Systems and Decisions
Published
2020-05-25
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
174-184
ISSN
  • 0251-1088 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5403
  • 2194-5411
OpenAlex
W3032443639
Cited by
626
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 214 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 25 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
75.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment Systems & Decisions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
none
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, resilience, systemic shocks, socio-economic systems, efficiency, interconnected systems, cascading failures, infrastructure resilience, crisis recovery, policy recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review