The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries
Abstract
Top ranking varieties are tested in multiple environments before and after registration in order to assess their value for cultivation and use (VCU testing). Recently, interest has increased in obtaining varieties specifically adapted to organic farming conditions. This raised the question if an independent system of trials may be required for this purpose. To help answering this question, through the exchange network of European cereal researchers SUSVAR (www.cost860.dk), a number of data sets of agronomic traits from barley, wheat and winter triticale, from trials performed in Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, France, Switzerland, UK and Germany, were made available and analysed using an approach based on mixed models involving parameters describing genetic correlation between the two types of experiments, i.e., organic and non-organic (high or low input). Estimated variance components and correlations were used to evaluate response to selection and index selection. The response to index selection was analysed as a function of the fraction of available trials assigned to the organic system. The genetic correlations were interpreted in terms of ranking agreement. We found high genetic correlations between both systems for most traits in all countries. Despite high genetic correlations, the chances of very good agreement in observed rankings were moderate. Combining information from both organic and non-organic systems is shown to be beneficial. Further, ignoring information…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Often, the genetic variance tends to be larger in better environments than in poorer environments, although the opposite can be observed as well (Przystalski et al., 2008).”
From The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis (2013) · cites this paper as Przystalski et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Approximate Inference in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Breslow, N. E., & Clayton, D. G. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10594284 · Cited by 4,662
Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (1992) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316856 · Cited by 1,926
BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing
Piepho, H., Möhring, J., Melchinger, A. E., & Büchse, A. (2007) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8 · Cited by 872
Self-citationEvidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems
Murphy, K., Garland-Campbell, K. A., Lyon, S. R., & Jones, S. S. (2007) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.011 · Cited by 370
The Economics of Organic Farming: An International Perspective
Lampkin, N. H., & Padel, S. (1994) · Cited by 257
Selection Methods in Plant Breeding
Bos, I., & Caligari, P. D. S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6370-1 · Cited by 127
Selection in Cultivar Trials—Is It Ignorable?
Piepho, H., & Möhring, J. (2005) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0038 · Cited by 113
Self-citationBest Linear Unbiased Prediction of Cultivar Effects for Subdivided Target Regions
Piepho, H., & Möhring, J. (2005) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0398 · Cited by 100
Self-citationQuantitative genetic studies on breeding maize for adaptation to organic farming
Burger, H., Schloen, M., Schmidt, W., & Geiger, H. H. (2008) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9723-4 · Cited by 56
Kitchen, J., McDonald, G. K., Shepherd, K. W., Lorimer, M. F., & Graham, R. D. (2003) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar03039 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kleijer G, Schwärzel R (2006) Qualité boulangère du blé d’automne dans les essais d’homologation extenso et bio. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture 38:31–34
- Osman AM, Lammerts van Bueren ET (2003) A participatory approach to designing and implementing organic ‘Value for Culivation and Use’ research. In: Lammerts van Bueren ET, Wilbois KP (eds) Organic seed production and plant breeding—strategies, problems and perspectives. Proceedings of ECO-PB 1st international symposium on organic seed production and plant breeding, Berlin, Germany, 21–22 November 2002, European Consortium for Organic Plant Breeding, Driebergen/Frankfurt, pp 46–49
- Schwärzel R, Levy L, Menzi M, Anders M, Winzeler H, Dörnte J (2006) Comparaison de deux réseaux d’essais variétaux de blé d’automne en cultures biologique et extensive. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture 38(1):35–40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00044 · Cited by 539
Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture
Wolfe, M. S., Baresel, J. P., Desclaux, D., Goldringer, I., Hoad, S. P., Kovacs, G., Löschenberger, F., Miedaner, T., Østergård, H., & van Bueren, E. T. L. (2008) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9 · Cited by 409
Self-citationBreeding for increased nitrogen‐use efficiency: a review for wheat ( T . aestivum L .)
Cormier, F., Foulkes, J. M., Hirel, B. J., Gouache, D., Moënne‐Loccoz, Y., & Gouis, J. L. (2016) · Plant Breeding · doi:10.1111/pbr.12371 · Cited by 245
Bilsborrow, P., Cooper, J., Tétard-Jones, C., Średnicka-Tober, D., Barański, M., Eyre, M., Schmidt, C., Shotton, P., Volakakis, N., Cakmak, I., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.06.003 · Cited by 97
Breeding for organic agriculture: the example of winter wheat in Austria
Löschenberger, F., Fleck, A., Grausgruber, H., Hetzendorfer, H., Hof, G., Lafferty, J., Mar�n, M. A., Neumayer, A., Pfaffinger, G., & Birschitzky, J. (2008) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9709-2 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Przystalski, M., Osman, A., Thiemt, E. M., Rolland, B., Ericson, L., Østergård, H., Levy, L., Wolfe, M., Büchse, A., Piepho, H.-P., & Krajewski, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
- Louis Bolk Instituut (NL)
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Przystalski, M.
- Venue
- Euphytica
- Published
- 2008-06-04
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-433
- ISSN
- 0014-2336 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5060
- OpenAlex
- W2113873706
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Euphytica (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- cereal varieties, organic farming, variety performance, Value for Cultivation and Use, genetic correlation, index selection, barley, wheat, winter triticale, agronomic traits, mixed models, variance components
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
