Cited by 141Genetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colorectal carcinoma: A brief review of predictive biomarkers in the era of personalized medicine

Open access
Gatalica, Zoran, Vranic, Semir, Xiu, Joanne, Swensen, Jeffrey, Reddy, Sandeep·2016·Familial Cancer

Abstract

Approximately 15 % of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) display high level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) due to either a germline mutation in one of the genes responsible for DNA mismatch repair (Lynch syndrome, 3 %) or somatic inactivation of the same pathway, most commonly through hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene (sporadic MSI-H, 12 %). Although heterogeneous, MSI-H colorectal carcinomas as a group show some distinct biologic characteristics when compared to CRC with stable or low level microsatellite instability. In the present review we will highlight therapeutically relevant characteristics of MSI-H tumors which could lead to specific responses to some conventional chemotherapy or novel targeted therapy agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10689-016-9884-6

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Cheng L (2009) Molecular genetic pathology, 1st edn. Humana Press, New Jersey, pp 455–457.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gatalica, Z., Vranic, S., Xiu, J., Swensen, J., & Reddy, S.
Affiliations
Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Gatalica, Zoran
Venue
Familial Cancer
Published
2016-02-13
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
405-412
ISSN
  • 1389-9600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7292
OpenAlex
W2262022146
Cited by
141
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Familial Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
microsatellite instability, predictive biomarkers, personalized medicine, DNA mismatch repair, Lynch syndrome, MLH1 hypermethylation, somatic inactivation, chemotherapy response, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
MutL Protein Homolog 1, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Germ-Line Mutation, DNA Methylation, DNA Repair Enzymes, Microsatellite Instability, DNA Mismatch Repair, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review