Cited by 13Fire Detection and Safety SystemsFire dynamics and safety researchFire effects on concrete materials

Hierarchical Temporal Memory Continuous Learning Algorithms for Fire State Determination

Ryder, Noah L., Geiman, Justin A., Weckman, Elizabeth J.·2021·Fire Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10694-020-01055-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryder, N. L., Geiman, J. A., & Weckman, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Ryder, Noah L.
Venue
Fire Technology
Published
2021-01-05
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
2905-2928
ISSN
  • 0015-2684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8099
OpenAlex
W3119704657
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fire Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire Detection and Safety Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Fire effects on concrete materials
Keywords
hierarchical temporal memory, fire detection, continuous learning, building sensors, fire prediction, false alarm reduction, real-time monitoring, building management systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review