Cited by 106Smart Agriculture and AIGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Application of Internet of Things (IoT) for Optimized Greenhouse Environments

Open access
Maraveas, Chrysanthos, Bartzanas, Thomas·2021·AgriEngineering

Abstract

This review presents the state-of-the-art research on IoT systems for optimized greenhouse environments. The data were analyzed using descriptive and statistical methods to infer relationships between the Internet of Things (IoT), emerging technologies, precision agriculture, agriculture 4.0, and improvements in commercial farming. The discussion is situated in the broader context of IoT in mitigating the adverse effects of climate change and global warming in agriculture through the optimization of critical parameters such as temperature and humidity, intelligent data acquisition, rule-based control, and resolving the barriers to the commercial adoption of IoT systems in agriculture. The recent unexpected and severe weather events have contributed to low agricultural yields and losses; this is a challenge that can be resolved through technology-mediated precision agriculture. Advances in technology have over time contributed to the development of sensors for frost prevention, remote crop monitoring, fire hazard prevention, precise control of nutrients in soilless greenhouse cultivation, power autonomy through the use of solar energy, and intelligent feeding, shading, and lighting control to improve yields and reduce operational costs. However, particular challenges abound, including the limited uptake of smart technologies in commercial agriculture, price, and accuracy of the sensors. The barriers and challenges should help guide future Research & Development projects and commercial applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriengineering3040060

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modern IoT-based control systems utilise communication protocols such as MQTT and LoRaWAN, which enable reliable data transmission from bioreactors to central databases even with limited connectivity.

    “Modern IoT-based control systems utilise communication protocols such as MQTT (message queuing telemetry transport) and LoRaWAN (long range wide area network), which enable reliable data transmission from bioreactors to central databases even with limited connectivity [248].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [248]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies MQTT as an IoT communication protocol that can operate at lower bandwidth, supporting that part of the claim. The paper concerns greenhouse systems; the passages found do not identify LoRaWAN or describe reliable transmission from bioreactors to central databases under limited connectivity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Patil, V.C.; Al-Gaadi, K.A.; Biradar, D.P.; Rangaswamy, M. Internet of Things (Iot) and Cloud Computing for Agriculture: An Overview. In Proceedings of the Agro-Informatics and Precision Agriculture (AIPA 2012), Raichur, India; 2012; pp. 292-296.
  2. Rojas, A. Smart Agriculture IoT with Cloud Computing. Rev. Hist. América 2015, 29, 37-66.
  3. Agrawal, N.; Katna, R. Applications of Computing, Automation and Wireless Systems in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 553.

Cited by

Authors
Maraveas, C., & Bartzanas, T.
Affiliations
Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Bartzanas, Thomas
Venue
AgriEngineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-11-29
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
954-970
ISSN
2624-7402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216612961
Cited by
106
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AgriEngineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
Internet of Things, precision agriculture, Agriculture 4.0, climate change mitigation in agriculture, temperature and humidity control, rule-based control, remote sensing of crops, fire prevention, agricultural yield improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review