Cited by 676Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesBanana Cultivation and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 312 of the 313 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods

Bairu, Michael W., Aremu, Adeyemi O., Van Staden, Johannes·2011·Plant Growth Regulation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x

Cites

312 of 312 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–312 of 312

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 313 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bright S, Jarret V, Nelson R, Creissen G, Karp A, Franklin J, Norbury P, Kueh J, Rognes S, Miflin B (1983) Modification of agronomic traits using in vitro technology. In: Mantell SH, Smith H (eds) Plant biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 251–265
  2. El-Sayed OE, Rizkalla AA, Sabri SRS (2007) In vitro mutagenesis for genetic improvement of salinity tolerance in wheat. Res J Agric Biol Sci 4:377–383
  3. Gengenbach BG, Umpeck P (1982) Characteristics of T-cytoplasm revertants from tissue culture. Maize Genet Coop News Lett 56:140–142
  4. Jain SM (1997) Micropropagation of selected somaclones of Begonia and Saintpaulia. J Biosci 22:582–592
  5. Joshi RK, Rao GJN (2009) Somaclonal variation in submergence tolerant rice cultivars and induced diversity evaluation by PCR markers. Int J Genet Mol Biol 1:80–88
  6. Lee YI, Lee IS, Lim YP (2002) Variation in sweetpotato regenerates from gamma-ray irridiated embryogenic callus. J Plant Biotechnol 4:163–170
  7. Mujib A, Banerjee S, Dev Ghosh P (2007) Callus induction, somatic embryogenesis and chromosomal instability in tissue culture-raised hippeastrum (Hippeastrum hybridum cv. United Nations). Propag Ornam Plants 7:169–174
  8. Rivera FN (1983) Protein and isoenzyme banding patterns among Philippine cooking bananas and their wild parents (Musa species). Paradisiaca 6:7–12
  9. Shepherd K, Dos Santos JA (1996) Mitotic instability in banana varieties. I. Plants from callus and shoot tip cultures. Fruits 51:5–11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 676

Metadata

Authors
Bairu, M. W., Aremu, A. O., & Van Staden, J.
Affiliations
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Venue
Plant Growth Regulation
Published
2010-12-25
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
147-173
ISSN
  • 0167-6903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5087
OpenAlex
W2054387047
Cited by
674
References
313
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Growth Regulation (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
Keywords
somaclonal variation, plant tissue culture, somaclonal variants, plant breeding, plant conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review