Cited by 14Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenetics and Plant Breeding

Application of somaclonal variation and in vitro selection to plant improvement

Bouharmont, J.·1994·Acta Horticulturae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17660/actahortic.1994.355.23

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Somaclonal variability is a source of genetic diversity that breeders can use for the generation of new plants with superior economic traits.

    “At the same time, somaclonal variability is a source of genetic diversity that breeders can use for the generation of new plants with superior economic traits [29,30,31,32].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouharmont, J.
Corresponding author
Bouharmont, J.
Venue
Acta Horticulturae
Published
1994-02
Issue
355
Pages
213-218
ISSN
  • 0567-7572 (ISSN-L)
  • 2406-6168
OpenAlex
W2591191644
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
somaclonal variation, in vitro selection, plant improvement, micropropagation, plant breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review