Cited by 45Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsChildren's Rights and Participation

Capacity and Competence in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Tan, Jacinta O. A., Fegert, Jorg. M.·2004·Health Care Analysis

Abstract

Capacity and competence in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry are complex issues, because of the many different influences that are involved in how children and adolescents make treatment decisions within the setting of mental health. This article will examine some of the influences which must be considered, namely: developmental aspects, the paradoxical relationship between the need for autonomy and participation and the capacity of children, family psychiatry, and the duty of care towards children and adolescents. The legal frameworks relevant to consideration of consent and competence will be briefly considered, as well as some studies of children's consent, participation and competence. A case vignette will be used as a focus to consider the complexity of the issue of competence in child and adolescent psychiatry, in the particular mental disorder of anorexia nervosa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10728-004-6636-9

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New cognitive skills are acquired in adolescence, referred to by Piaget as hypothetico-deductive reasoning: the ability to think of hypothetical solutions and to formulate a systematic plan for deducing which of these solutions is correct.

    “New cognitive skills are acquired, referred to by Piaget as hypothetico-deductive reasoning: the ability to think of hypothetical solutions and to formulate a systematic plan for deducing which of these solutions is correct [12, 13].”
  • In adolescence, biological, cognitive, and social development progress and the brain undergoes substantial change with an increase in efficiency of brain functioning.

    “In adolescence, biological, cognitive, and social development progress and the brain undergoes substantial change with an increase in efficiency of brain functioning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, J. O. A., & Fegert, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Tan, Jacinta O. A.
Venue
Health Care Analysis
Published
2004-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
285-294
ISSN
  • 1065-3058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3394
OpenAlex
W2051412017
Cited by
45
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Care Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
decision-making capacity, competence, child and adolescent psychiatry, child consent, children's participation, autonomy, family psychiatry, duty of care, anorexia nervosa, developmental factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Child Care, Female, Humans, Male, Morals, Patient Participation, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review