Cited by 142Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Perceptions of coercion in the admission of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric patients

Hoge, Steven K., Lidz, Charles W., Eisenberg, Marlene, Gardner, William, Monahan, John, Mulvey, Edward, Roth, Loren, Bennett, Nancy·1997·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-2527(97)00001-0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status.

    “All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status (10–15).”
  • High degrees of perceived coercion were found among those receiving voluntary care.

    “As a result, perceptions of coercion were not necessarily related to objective legal status (12,33), with high degrees of perceived coercion found among those receiving voluntary care (11,13–15,27,29).”
  • Close relatives were found to use threats or pressures to facilitate hospital admission.

    “Similarly, close relatives were found to use threats or pressures to facilitate hospital admission [37]”
  • Numerous studies have shown that involuntary hospitalization is associated with higher perceived coercion.

    “Numerous studies have shown that involuntary hospitalization is associated with higher perceived coercion [10,13,14,15,35,37,38,42,44,45,48,59,64,72,94,96,120,129,131,137,139,151,155,160].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoge, S. K., Lidz, C. W., Eisenberg, M., Gardner, W., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., & Bennett, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Hoge, Steven K.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
167-181
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053672452
Cited by
142
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric admission, patient experience, shared decision-making, patient voice, patient-staff relationships, coping strategies, alternatives to coercion, mental health reform, care ethics
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Patient Advocacy, Pennsylvania, Social Support, Time Factors, Virginia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review