Reviewing institutional policies for electronic management of assessment
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditionally, coversheets have been key tools for promoting academic integrity, informing students of procedural requirements like plagiarism declarations.
“Traditionally, coversheets have been key tools for promoting academic integrity, informing students of procedural requirements like plagiarism declarations (Voce 2015).”
From Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Voce 2015
In the discussion of Policy 4, Voce quotes a requirement that students submit assessments using an online assignment cover sheet. That supports the use of coversheets in submission, but the paper does not say they were traditionally key to promoting academic integrity or that they informed students about plagiarism declarations. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611 · see citing works
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485 · see citing works
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 · Cited by 5,077 · see citing works
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9780857028020 · Cited by 4,725 · see citing works
An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics
Eggins, S. (1994) · Cited by 2,069 · see citing works
Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology.
Wodak, R. (2009) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 1,440 · see citing works
Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction
van Dijk, T. A. (2011) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446289068 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Critical Discourse Analysis in Education: A Review of the Literature
Rogers, R. L., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003365 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Politics and Policy Making in Education
Donn, G., & Ball, S. J. (1991) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3120992 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Interactive learning environments?
Greener, S. (2012) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.675739 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: using critical discourse analysis
*, S. T. (2004) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/0268093042000227483 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
5. BEYOND SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY CRITIQUE: DEVELOPMENTS IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Luke, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190502000053 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Politics and Policy Making in Education
Ball, S. J. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203808726 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2006) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v14i2.10952 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Dahl, S. V. (2007) · 50 Ways to Use Technology Enhanced Learning in the Classroom: Practical strategies for teaching · doi:10.1177/1469787407074110 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
WALKER, R. A., Voce, J., & Jenkins, M. D. (2013) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.867888 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationBuckley, E. J., & Cowap, L. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12054 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
A comparison of electronic and paper‐based assignment submission and feedback
Bridge, P., & Appleyard, R. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00753.x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Richard, F. (2006) · ALT-J · doi:10.1080/09687760600668503 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Thomas, S. (2005) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508480509556423 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The Management of Assessment in Higher Education
Yorke, M. (1998) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293980230201 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
‘Who do you think you’re talking to?’—the discourse of learning and teaching strategies
Smith, K. (2007) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9100-6 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Online assignment management: an evolutionary tale
Jones, D. J., & Behrens, S. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1174347 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Downton, A. C., Glasfurd-Brown, G., & Mossop, R. (2006) · Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Electronic Management of Assessment 2016: a HeLF Survey Report
Newland, B., & Martin, L. A. (2016) · University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bancroft, P., Hynd, J., Dal Santo, F., & Reye, J. (2003). Web-based assignment submission and electronic marking. Paper presented at the 26th Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Annual Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
- Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173-191.
- Nolan, J., & Mayfield, W. (2008). A Collaborative Enquiry into Academic Practice: an exploration of the meanings of formative assessment -A Preliminary Critical Discourse Analysis of the Institutional Context. Paper presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) Annual Conference, Liverpool, UK.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonsalves, C. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“Traditionally, coversheets have been key tools for promoting academic integrity, informing students of procedural requirements like plagiarism declarations (voce 2015).”
Personalized Assessment as a Means to Mitigate Plagiarism
Manoharan, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2016.2604210 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Winstone, N. (2022) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00818-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Plagiarism and the commodification of knowledge
McKenna, S. (2022) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00926-5 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Assessment of the management of student affairs records
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2019) · Records Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rmj-01-2019-0004 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
E-Management as a Game Changer in Local Public Administration
Vilkaité-Vaitoné, N., & Povilaitiene, K. (2022) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies10080180 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Berry, S. (2019) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.25304/rlt.v27.2284 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Transformation of Historically Black Universities in South Africa to Provide Access to Information
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2022) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8025-7.ch008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Implementation of the SharePoint Platform as a Record Management System in Universities
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2022) · Advances in knowledge acquisition, transfer, and management book series/Advances in knowledge acquisition, transfer and management book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3364-5.ch007
Healthcare System Transformation of Southern African Countries
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2022) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6044-3.ch001
Digitization of Archival Materials in South Africa
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2022) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4895-3.ch010
Strategic Behaviours In Municipal Decision-Making: A Strategic Approach
S.Alotaibi, N. O., & Abdelwahed, N. A. A. (2023) · Journal of Law and Sustainable Development · doi:10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2321
- Authors
- Voce, J.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Voce, Julie
- ORCID
- Voce, Julie
- Venue
- Higher Education
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 915-929
- ISSN
- 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-174X
- OpenAlex
- W1997891804
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
- Keywords
- institutional policy, online assessment, virtual learning environments, Turnitin, higher education institutions, policy clarity, student agency, UK higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
