Cited by 55Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsSurvey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Meta-analysis of survey data: application to health services research

Rao, Sowmya R., Graubard, Barry I., Schmid, Christopher H., Morton, Sally C., Louis, Thomas A., Zaslavsky, Alan M., Finkelstein, Dianne M.·2008·Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10742-008-0032-0

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, S. R., Graubard, B. I., Schmid, C. H., Morton, S. C., Louis, T. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Finkelstein, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rao, Sowmya R.
Venue
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
Published
2008-05-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
98-114
ISSN
  • 1387-3741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9400
OpenAlex
W2019341969
Cited by
55
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
survey data, microdata, summary data, electronic health records, prevalence estimation, health services research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review