Cited by 304Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHealthcare Policy and Management

How Common Are Electronic Health Records In The United States? A Summary Of The Evidence: About one-fourth of U.S. physician practices are now using an EHR, according to the results of high-quality surveys.

Jha, Ashish K., Ferris, Timothy G., Donelan, Karen, DesRoches, Catherine, Shields, Alexandra, Rosenbaum, Sara, Blumenthal, David·2006·Health Affairs

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are promising tools to improve quality and efficiency in health care, but data on their adoption rate are limited. We identified surveys on EHR adoption and assessed their quality. Although surveys returned widely different estimates of EHR use, when available information is limited to studies of high or medium quality, national estimates are possible: Through 2005, approximately 23.9 percent of physicians used EHRs in the ambulatory setting, while 5 percent of hospitals used computerized physician order entry. Large gaps in knowledge, including information about EHR use among safety-net providers, pose critical challenges for the development of policies aimed at speeding adoption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, A. K., Ferris, T. G., Donelan, K., DesRoches, C., Shields, A., Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2006-01
Volume
25
Issue
Suppl1
Pages
W496-W507
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2160477814
Cited by
304
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
93.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
electronic health records, EHR adoption, computerized physician order entry, outpatient care, hospitals, safety net providers, health IT policy, survey quality
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Information Systems, Diffusion of Innovation, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Michigan, Organizational Innovation, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Health Care Surveys, Medical Order Entry Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review