Teachers’ Perceptions of the Use of Moodle Activities and Their Learning Impact in Secondary Education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only 4% of papers analyse the teachers' perspectives of using Moodle.
“However, only 4% of papers analyse the teachers’ perspectives of using Moodle (Babo & Suhonen, 2018; Badia et al., 2019; García-Martín & García-Sánchez, 2020; Jackson, 2017; Marczak et al., 2016; Valero & Cárdenas, 2017).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Badia et al., 2019
Only two research studies focused exclusively on teacher opinions, perceptions, and experiences in e-assessment, Moodle activities, and their learning impacts.
“Only two research studies focused exclusively on teacher opinions, perceptions, and experiences in e-assessment, Moodle activities, and their learning impacts (Babo & Suhonen, 2018; Badia et al., 2019).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Badia et al., 2019
Cites
Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers
van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03173218 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
- Authors
- Badia, A., Martín, D., & Gómez, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Badia, Antoni
- ORCID
- Badia, Antoni
- Venue
- Technology, Knowledge and Learning
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-499
- ISSN
- 2211-1662 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-1670
- OpenAlex
- W2794013728
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Technology Knowledge and Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- Moodle, virtual learning environments, teacher perceptions, secondary education, online learning tools, quizzes, forum, groupware, assessment instruments, educational technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
