The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Technological innovations such as blended learning (BL) are rapidly changing teaching and learning in higher education, where BL integrates face to face teaching with web based learning. Thus, as polices related to BL increases, it is required to explore the theoretical foundation of BL studies and how BL were adopted and implemented in relation to students, lecturers and administration. However, only fewer studies have focused on exploring the constructs and factors related to BL adoption by considering the students, lecturers and administration concurrently. Likewise, prior research neglects to explore what practices are involved for BL implementation. Accordingly, this study systematically reviews, synthesizes, and provides meta-analysis of 94 BL research articles published from 2004 to 2020 to present the theoretical foundation of BL adoption and implementation in higher education. The main findings of this study present the constructs and factors that influence students, lecturers and administration towards adopting BL in higher education. Moreover, findings suggest that the BL practices to be implemented comprises of face-to-face, activities, information, resources, assessment, and feedback for students and technology, pedagogy, content, and knowledge for lecturers. Besides, the review reveals that the ad hoc, technology acceptance model, information system success model, the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and lastly diffusion of innovations theories are the mostly employed theories employed by prior studies to explore BL adoption. Findings from this study has implications for student, lecturers and administrators by providing insights into the theoretical foundation of BL adoption and implementation in higher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · Cited by 4,849
What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741319300303 · Cited by 2,790
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education
(2025) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · doi:10.70725/833004pqfpbd · Cited by 2,368
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544 · Cited by 1,853
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 · Cited by 1,221
Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 · Cited by 921
Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005 · Cited by 913
A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 · Cited by 829
Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011 · Cited by 655
Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008 · Cited by 628
Self-citation
Cited by
Educational Technology Adoption: A systematic review
Granić, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 · Cited by 348
Development and validation of a students’ remote learning attitude scale (RLAS) in higher education
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10586-0 · Cited by 63
Tomej, K., Liburd, J., Blichfeldt, B. S., & Hjalager, A.-M. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100144 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L.
- Venue
- Technology, Knowledge and Learning
- Published
- 2020-10-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 531-578
- ISSN
- 2211-1662 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-1670
- OpenAlex
- W3091990735
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
- The paper
- Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.