Cited by 39Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

How Do Individuals Justify and Rationalize Their Criminal Behaviors in Online Romance Fraud?

Offei, Martin, Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi, Ayaburi, Emmanuel W., Asamoah, David·2022·Information Systems Frontiers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-020-10051-2

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The romantic context serves to disguise requests for money so they are not necessarily recognised as such and are not the main focus of the interaction.

    “The romantic context also serves to disguise requests for money so they aren't necessarily recognised as such and are not the main focus of the interaction (Offei et al. 2022).”

    From The Language of Romance Crimes (2024) · cites this paper as Offei et al. 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Offei, M., Andoh-Baidoo, F. K., Ayaburi, E. W., & Asamoah, D.
Affiliations
  • Koforidua Technical University (GH)
  • The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Corresponding author
Asamoah, David
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2020-08-15
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
475-491
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W3049073900
Cited by
39
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
neutralization theory, rationalization, criminal intent, internet cafes, victim-offender overlap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review