Cited by 36Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) for digital health and medical analytics.

Open access
Sivarajah, Uthayasankar, Wang, Yichuan, Olya, Hossein, Mathew, Sherin·2023·Information Systems Frontiers

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-023-10412-7

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global consensus can foster responsible and ethical use of AI and robotics in healthcare worldwide.

    “Global consensus can foster responsible and ethical use worldwide.[6,56]”

    From Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction describes ethical and responsible AI use in healthcare and notes that countries have adopted data-protection regulations. The Pathways for Further Research section calls for policies and legislation, but neither section says that global consensus would foster responsible use worldwide; the passages also do not address robotics. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sivarajah, U., Wang, Y., Olya, H., & Mathew, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bradford (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Sivarajah, Uthayasankar
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2023-06-05
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
2117-2122
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W4379386266
Cited by
36
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
responsible AI, digital health, patient trust, personalized medicine, patient information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review