Cited by 206Design Education and PracticeScience Education and PedagogyEngineering Education and Pedagogy

How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices

Fan, Szu-Chun, Yu, Kuang-Chao·2017·International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, S.-C., & Yu, K.-C.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yu, Kuang-Chao
Venue
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2015-09-08
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
107-129
ISSN
  • 0957-7572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1804
OpenAlex
W1458493512
Cited by
206
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Technology and Design Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council Taiwan (TW) (NSC 101-2511-S-003 -039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
engineering design practice, high school technology education, conceptual knowledge, higher-order thinking skills, analysis skills, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review