Cited by 22Problem and Project Based LearningDesign Education and PracticeEngineering Education and Pedagogy

The role of learning style in engineering design thinking via project-based STEM course

Chang, Chi-Cheng, Yen, Wan-Hsuan·2023·Asia Pacific Journal of Education

Abstract

Engineering design thinking is at the core of engineering competence. Project-Based learning (PjBL) about Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), which is based on engineering design, has brought enormous success in students’ gaining and applying knowledge about STEM subjects. However, there are few studies on the perceived improvement in engineering design thinking and the possible role that learning style (LS) plays. We implemented PjBL-STEM classes to enable students to design and build a water tower using a truss tower structure that can withstand earthquakes. Constraints such as height, load weight, tower weight, and degree of earthquake withstanding were included. A total of 137 Taiwanese students participated in this course and employed a Gregorc learning style delineator to determine their learning preferences. A pre-test and post-test on perceived engineering design thinking performance was also undertaken. Students demonstrated significant improvements in their perceived engineering design thinking. Additionally, abstract-type learners had greater perceived improvement than concrete-type learners from the PjBL-STEM course. We suggest that different pedagogical methods should be utilized to provide equal opportunities for each student.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02188791.2021.1957776

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medium-duration studies of 5-15 weeks demonstrated that integrating DT into STEM education significantly enhanced students' STEM competence, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive engagement.

    “Medium-duration studies (5-15 weeks) demonstrated that integrating DT into STEM education significantly enhanced students'STEM competence, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive engagement (Chang & Yen, 2021;He et al., 2023;Ng & Fergusson, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, C.-C., & Yen, W.-H.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yen, Wan-Hsuan
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
Published
2021-12-21
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
1125-1143
ISSN
  • 0129-4776 (ISSN-L)
  • 0218-8791
  • 1742-6855
OpenAlex
W4200405720
Cited by
22
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
learning styles, engineering design thinking, project-based learning, STEM education, engineering competencies, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review