Cited by 37Problem and Project Based LearningScience Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Effect of design‐based learning on achievement in K‐12 education: A m eta‐analysis

Delen, Ibrahim, Sen, Sedat·2023·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

Design‐based learning (DBL) offers opportunities to support students' content understanding. Previous DBL studies reported different effect sizes by using the data from one participant group. The goal of this study was to conduct a meta‐analysis that would give a comprehensive picture of how DBL is connected to student achievement in different disciplines. In addition, we explored the moderators influencing achievement in DBL for K‐12 education. After investigating content‐related gains in our meta‐analysis on 37 individual articles with 52 effect sizes, we found that DBL had a positive and large effect ( = 0.602) on achievement in K‐12 education, and the effect size for science ( = 0.703) was higher than mathematics ( = 0.418) education. When considering the strong emphasis on science education in different DBL related frameworks and STEM (science, engineering, technology, and mathematics) education studies, this cumulative understanding could play an important role in the difference between science and mathematics. Studies that had control groups in the same school ( = 0.703) had statistically significantly higher effect sizes compared to studies that included control groups from different schools ( = 0.447). Studies with random assignment ( = 0.258) had statistically significantly smaller effect sizes compared to studies with non‐random assignment ( = 0.623). In addition, the effect of DBL on achievement showed statistically significant differences among different countries. The remaining moderators (school level, content support, measurement type, and experimental design) did not show statistically significant differences in terms of the effect of DBL on student achievement. Our review presents evidence that participating in DBL activities supports student achievement after the intervention, but how students transfer their content gains in other situations needs convincing evidence. To overcome this challenge, future studies can prioritize how to support achievement in state mandated tests to understand DBL's effect on students' content gains in different learning situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.21800

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses show medium-to large-sized positive effects of learning-by-design on student achievement in K-12 STEM education.

    “Meta-analyses show medium-to large-sized positive effects on student achievement in K-12 STEM education (Delen & Sen, 2023).”

    From Looking Beyond the Hype: Understanding the Effects of AI on Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Delen & Sen, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Delen, I., & Sen, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Educational Sciences Usak University Usak Turkey
  • Department of Educational Sciences Harran University Sanliurfa Turkey
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-30
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
330-356
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W4288855698
Cited by
37
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
design-based learning, academic performance, K-12 education, science education, mathematics education, STEM education, moderators of effect size, random assignment, control group comparison, cross-national differences, content understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review