Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simeon et al. (2020) emphasized that DT's constructivist environment enhances understanding of STEM subjects like physics.
“Simeon et al. (2020) further emphasized how DT's constructivist environment, which builds real-life experiences, enhances understanding of STEM subjects like physics (Simeon et al., 2020).”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Simeon et al., 2020
Research by Yalçın (2021) and Simeon et al. (2020) demonstrated that DT positively influences creative thinking among students.
“Research by Yalçın (2021) and Simeon et al. (2020) demonstrated that DT positively influences creative thinking among students (Simeon et al., 2020;Yalçın, 2021).”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Simeon et al., 2020
Medium-duration DT programs also boosted creative self-efficacy and STEM interest.
“Medium-duration DT program also boosted creative self-efficacy and STEM interest (Fan & Yu, 2017;Simeon et al., 2020)”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Simeon et al., 2020
Design thinking also boosted creative self-efficacy and STEM interest among students.
“also boosted creative self-efficacy and STEM interest (Fan & Yu, 2017;Simeon et al., 2020) as students took more responsibility for their learning and were more inclined to pursue.”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Simeon et al., 2020
The effect sizes ranged from low d = 0.001 to high d = 2.7789.
“The ES values ranged from low (d = 0.001) (Kim et al., 2022) to high (d = 2.7789) (Simeon et al., 2020).”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Simeon et al., 2020
Cites
New Effect Size Rules of Thumb
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 · Cited by 3,254 · see citing works
Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests
Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah6524 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214549471 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Physical Activity of Children Attending Afterschool Programs
Beets, M. W., Huberty, J., & Beighle, A. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of learning style in engineering design thinking via project-based STEM course
Chang, C.-C., & Yen, W.-H. (2023) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2021.1957776 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Muneer, S., Santhosh, M., Parangusan, H., & Bhadra, J. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Abuja (NG)
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Simeon, Moses Irekpita
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology and Design Education
- Published
- 2020-06-16
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 185-212
- ISSN
- 0957-7572 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1804
- OpenAlex
- W3036401735
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Technology and Design Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
- Keywords
- design thinking, physics achievement, STEM education, gender differences in achievement, high school physics, constructivism, teacher professional development, physics teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review