Cited by 76Physical Activity and HealthYouth Development and Social SupportObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Physical Activity of Children Attending Afterschool Programs

Beets, Michael W., Huberty, Jennifer, Beighle, Aaron·2012·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Afterschool programs (3PM-6PM; ASPs) are positioned to play a vital role in the improvement of children's daily physical activity. Recent guidelines specify that children should accumulate 4600 steps per day while attending an ASP. The extent to which ASPs currently meet this goal and how many steps per day children naturally accumulate within the ASP setting is unknown. Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the pedometer-determined physical activity of a large sample of children attending a diverse range of ASPs and evaluate the extent to which ASPs are meeting current physical activity guidelines. Methods Children (N=934, 51% girls, average 8.2 years; range 4-14 years) enrolled across 25 ASPs wore Walk4Life MVPa pedometers (number of steps accumulated, time spent active [hours:minutes:seconds]) up to 4 days. Data were collected in fall/spring 2010-2011 and analyzed in summer 2011. Results On average, children attended ASPs for 125 minutes per day, accumulated 2944 steps per day, and spent approximately 26.6 minutes per day in physical activity. Only 16.5% of the 1819 daily observations met the 4600 steps per day guideline. No differences in steps per day, minutes per day in physical activity, or demographics were observed among children measured a single day versus 2, 3, or 4 days. Based on current practice, children would need to spend approximately 3.4 hours per day at an ASP to reach 4600 steps per day. Conclusions Activity levels in ASPs are well below recommendations. Substantial effort is needed to identify strategies ASPs can employ to ensure children are sufficiently active.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.007

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beets, M. W., Huberty, J., & Beighle, A.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Beets, Michael W.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
180-184
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1586451158
Cited by
76
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
after-school programs, children's physical activity, daily step count, physical activity guidelines, pedometer-measured activity, childhood sedentary behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Care, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Exercise, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review