The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretation of Ambiguous Information in Girls at Risk for Depression
Open accessAbstract
Research has consistently documented that depressed individuals process information in a negatively biased manner. There is little evidence, however, concerning whether these biases represent risk factors for depression, as is hypothesized by cognitive models. In the present study we investigated whether a particular cognitive bias observed in currently depressed individuals, the tendency to interpret ambiguous information negatively, characterizes daughters of depressed mothers, a population known to be at increased risk for depression. Following a negative mood induction, young daughters of depressed and never-disordered mothers completed two information-processing tasks in which their interpretations of emotionally ambiguous stimuli were evaluated. Daughters of depressed mothers interpreted ambiguous words more negatively and less positively, and ambiguous stories more negatively, than did daughters of never-disordered mothers. These results provide support for cognitive vulnerability models of depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095 · Cited by 7,988
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Goodman, S. H., & Gotlib, I. H. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.458 · Cited by 2,493
Self-citationCost of Lost Productive Work Time Among US Workers With Depression
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3135 · Cited by 1,421
Puberty and depression: the roles of age, pubertal status and pubertal timing.
ANGOLD, A., COSTELLO, E. J., & WORTHMAN, C. M. (1998) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329179700593x · Cited by 989
Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety.
Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.109.4.602 · Cited by 739 · cited 2×
“Ambiguous Stories In the second task, derived from procedures used by Mathews and his colleagues (Hirsch and Mathews 1997; Mathews and Mackintosh 2000), daughters were presented with short stories in which the emotional valence of the story remained ambiguous until the final word was presented, resolving the ambiguity.”
Cognitive processes in anxiety
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(83)90015-2 · Cited by 738
Anxiety and depression: an information processing perspective
Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1988) · Anxiety Research · doi:10.1080/10615808808248218 · Cited by 510 · cited 1×
“Interpreting ambiguous information in a negative manner, particularly when this occurs repeatedly over time, is posited by cognitive theorists to have a pernicious longterm effect on emotional state (e.g., Beck and Clark 1991 ).”
Lewinsohn, P. M., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., Klein, D. N., & Gotlib, I. H. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1584 · Cited by 458
Self-citation
Cited by
Cognition and Depression: Current Status and Future Directions
Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305 · Cited by 2,420
“Finally, Dearing & Gotlib (2009) recently reported a negative interpretation bias in never-disordered daughters of depressed mothers, providing evidence for a role of these biases in increasing risk for the onset of depression.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorder
Luscher, B., Shen, Q., & Sahir, N. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.120 · Cited by 934
Depression: A cognitive perspective
LeMoult, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.008 · Cited by 792
Self-citationExamining emotion regulation in depression: A review and future directions
Joormann, J., & Stanton, C. H. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.007 · Cited by 749
Risk factors for depression: an autobiographical review
Hammen, C. (2018) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084811 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Dearing, K. F., & Gotlib, I. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
- Published
- 2008-08-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-91
- ISSN
- 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2835
- OpenAlex
- W2085057050
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of Ambiguous Information in Girls at Risk for Depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10802-008-9259-z
- The paper
- Dearing, K. F., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Interpretation of Ambiguous Information in Girls at Risk for Depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9259-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
