Cited by 122Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Relational stressors and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Rejection sensitivity as a vulnerability

Open access
Chango, Joanna M., McElhaney, Kathleen Boykin, Allen, Joseph P., Schad, Megan M., Marston, Emily·2012·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

The role of rejection sensitivity as a critical diathesis moderating the link between adolescent relational stressors and depressive symptoms was examined using multi-method, multi-reporter data from a diverse community sample of 173 adolescents, followed from age 16 to 18. Relational stressors examined included emotional abuse, maternal behavior undermining adolescents’ autonomy and relatedness, and lack of support from close peers. As hypothesized, multiple relational stressors were found to predict the future development of depressive symptoms, but as hypothesized predictions existed primarily for adolescents who were highly rejection sensitive. Results are discussed in terms of a diathesis-stress model of depression and suggest that though relational stressors have previously shown consistent modest links to depressive symptoms, understanding pre-existing intrapsychic vulnerabilities of the adolescent may be critical to identifying the processes by which such stressors lead to depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-011-9570-y

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extensive research has shown that rejection sensitivity is associated with a range of mental health problems.

    “Extensive research has shown that rejection sensitivity is associated with a range of mental health problems (e.g., Chango, McElhaney, Allen, Schad, & Marston, 2012;Chesin, Fertuck, Goodman, Lichenstein, & Stanley, 2015;Rowe, Gembeck, Rudolph, & Nesdale, 2015;Webb et al., 2015).”

    From Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review (2017) · cites this paper as Chango et al., 2012

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports that rejection sensitivity, combined with relational stressors, predicted increases in depressive symptoms among adolescents. The paper also discusses prior research on internalizing disorders, but its own findings concern depressive symptoms, not a range of mental health problems. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck AT Cognitive models of depression Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, An International Quarterly 1987 1 5 37
  2. Bretherton I Munholland KA Cassidy J Shaver P Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory Handbook of attachment 2008 New York The Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chango, J. M., McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., & Marston, E.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Chango, Joanna M.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2011-09-17
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
369-379
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2025426643
Cited by
122
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01hd058305-17a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH58066, R01MH058066)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD058305, 9R01HD058305-11A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
rejection sensitivity, depressive symptoms, late adolescence, emotional abuse, peer support, diathesis-stress model, depression vulnerability, adolescent depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child Abuse, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Peer Group, Regression Analysis, Rejection, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review