Cited by 98Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMental Health and Patient InvolvementFamily and Disability Support Research

Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders

Frazier, Thomas W., Dawson, Geraldine, Murray, Donna, Shih, Andy, Sachs, Jessica Snyder, Geiger, Angela·2018·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Inclusion of stakeholder voices in the allocation of research funding can increase the relevance of results and improve community engagement in research. We describe the results of an online survey that gathered input from community stakeholders regarding autism research priorities. A demographically diverse sample of respondents (N = 6004; 79.1% female; 72.5% ages 30-59; 86.4% USA) completed the survey. Results indicated a preference for applied relative to basic science topics, though both basic and applied science areas were rated as important. Respondents gave their highest ratings to research focused on co-occurring conditions, health and well-being, adult transition, and lifespan issues. These results can guide decision-making by public and private funders when developing science funding priorities and engaging in science dissemination activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-018-3642-6

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A James Lind Alliance survey in 2018 by Autistica, and a similar large survey in North America, found that mental health was a top priority research area identified by autistic adults.

    “A James Lind Alliance survey in 2018 by research charity Autistica, and a similar large survey of stakeholders in North America (Frazier et al, 2018), found that mental health was a top priority research area identified by autistic adults.”
  • This focus is in sharp contrast to the stated research priorities of community members - autistic people, their family members, educators, clinicians and other professionals - who have consistently called for research on areas that are of more immediate, practical concern or for basic science research that may be more straightforwardly translated into applications.

    “This focus is in sharp contrast to the stated research priorities of community members – autistic people, their family members, educators, clinicians and other professionals – who have consistently called for research on areas that are of more immediate, practical concern or for basic science research that may be more straightforwardly translated into applications (Frazier et al., 2018; Jose et al”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frazier, T. W., Dawson, G., Murray, D., Shih, A., Sachs, J. S., & Geiger, A.
Affiliations
Autism Speaks (US)
Corresponding author
Frazier, Thomas W.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2018-06-15
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
3965-3971
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2807852720
Cited by
97
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
stakeholder engagement, research funding allocation, co-occurring conditions, adult transition, health and well-being, science dissemination, community-engaged research
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, Adult, Attitude, Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review