Cited by 35Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

EEG Biofeedback for Addictive Disorders—The State of the Art in 2004

Trudeau, David L.·2005·Journal of Adult Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10804-005-7030-z

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trudeau, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Trudeau, David L.
Venue
Journal of Adult Development
Published
2005-08
Volume
12
Issue
2-3
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 1068-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3440
OpenAlex
W2012782073
Cited by
34
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adult Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
neurofeedback, substance use disorders, alcoholism, autosuggestion, hypnagogic state, stimulant abuse, crack cocaine dependence, cognitive impairment, comorbidities, treatment-resistant addiction, medication-free treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review