CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enabling a Socio-cognitive Perspective of Mindfulness: The Development and Validation of the Langer Mindfulness Scale

Pirson, Michael A., Langer, Ellen, Zilcha, Sigal·2018·Journal of Adult Development
DOI 10.1007/s10804-018-9282-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10804-018-9282-4

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 79 references

6 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bodner, T. (2000). On the assessment of individual differences in mindful information processing: A thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  2. Chow, E. (2012). Mind your money: Mindfulness in socially responsible investment decision-making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  4. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory–versions 4a and 54. In. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  5. Langer, E. (2009). Counter clockwise. New York: Ballantine Books.
  6. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
  7. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Thompson, M., Naccarato, M., & Parker, K. (1989). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and the personal fear of invalidity scales. In CPA (Ed.), Annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association. Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–105 of 105

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pirson, M. A., Langer, E., & Zilcha, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Langer, Ellen
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Adult Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-01-24
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
168-185
ISSN
  • 1068-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3440
DOI
10.1007/s10804-018-9282-4
OpenAlex
W2784876129
Cited by
106
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Adult Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
mindfulness measurement, scale development, factor structure, psychological well-being, life satisfaction, humor, physical well-being, job satisfaction, creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review