Cited by 61Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Predicting the Underlying Factors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates in Public Universities: A Path Analysis Approach

Imran, Adesile M., Nordin, Mohamad Sahari·2013·Journal of Academic Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10805-013-9183-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imran, A. M., & Nordin, M. S.
Affiliations
International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Imran, Adesile M.
Venue
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
103-120
ISSN
  • 1570-1727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8544
OpenAlex
W2001865174
Cited by
61
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Academic Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, undergraduate students, public universities, psychological motives, academic integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review