Cited by 201Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection

FACTORS INFLUENCING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ DECISIONS TO CHEAT BY TYPE OF ASSESSMENT

Passow, Honor J., Mayhew, Matthew J., Finelli, Cynthia J., Harding, Trevor S., Carpenter, Donald D.·2006·Research in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11162-006-9010-y

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
  • Kettering University (US)
  • Lawrence Technological University (US)
Corresponding author
Finelli, Cynthia J.
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Published
2006-04-19
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
643-684
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
OpenAlex
W2104524267
Cited by
201
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Keywords
academic dishonesty, engineering students, theory of planned behavior, exam cheating, assessment types, moral obligation, attitudes toward cheating, perceived social pressure, student stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review