Inconsistent Access, Uneven Approach: Ethical Implications and Practical Concerns of Prioritizing Legal Interests over Cultures of Academic Integrity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bretag et al.'s academic integrity policy assessment framework has been used in several national analyses of academic integrity policies.
“However, Bretag et al.'s (2011a;2011b) academic integrity policy assessment framework, which has been used in several national analyses of academic integrity policies (Cullen & Murphy, 2025;Miron et al., 2021;Moya”
From Policy analysis of higher education institutes in Ontario, Canada: A focus on artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Cullen & Murphy, 2025
Cites
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832320109599052 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faculty as street-level bureaucrats: discretionary decision-making in the era of generative AI
Alsharefeen, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1662657 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Miron, J., & Facciolo, L. (2025) · Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity · doi:10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i5.81779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cullen, C. S., & Murphy, G.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cullen, Courtney S.
- ORCID
- Cullen, Courtney S.
- Venue
- Journal of Academic Ethics
- Published
- 2025-02-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1415-1434
- ISSN
- 1570-1727 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8544
- OpenAlex
- W4407609881
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Academic Ethics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Keywords
- academic integrity policy, higher education institutions, policy implementation, academic ethics, institutional policy, United States higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
