The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Newman, M. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 · Cited by 6,595
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 1×
“…Wide Web (Adamic and Huberman 2000a; Albert et al. 1999; Broder et al. 2000; Huberman and Adamic 1999), co-authorship of papers (Barabási et al. 2002; Newman 2001), the brain (Sporns 2002; Sporns et al. 2000; White et al. 1986), and even the web of human sexual contacts (Liljeros et al. 2001).”
BackgroundHillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511597237 · Cited by 4,322
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 · Cited by 3,191
Classes of small-world networks
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200327197 · Cited by 3,051
Cited by
Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2015) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/14-2274.1 · Cited by 632
Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest
Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, W. R., Roberts, J. M., Hill, J. B., Huntley, D. L., Borck, L., Breiger, R. L., Clauset, A., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219966110 · Cited by 260
Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation
Collar, A., Coward, F., Brughmans, T., & Mills, B. J. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9235-6 · Cited by 183
Self-citationArchaeology of Trade in the Western Indian Ocean, 300 BC–AD 700
Seland, E. H. (2014) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-014-9075-7 · Cited by 133
Golitko, M., & Feinman, G. M. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9211-1 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Brughmans, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 623-662
- ISSN
- 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7764
- OpenAlex
- W2046824499
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8
- The paper
- Brughmans, T. (2013). Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
