CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Procurement and Distribution of Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican Obsidian 900 BC–AD 1520: a Social Network Analysis

Golitko, Mark, Feinman, Gary M.·2015·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
DOI 10.1007/s10816-014-9211-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-014-9211-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weighted edges are a common feature in studies analysing exchange of material culture to understand relative importance of connections.

    “Weighted edges are however a common feature in studies analysing the exchange of material culture (e.g.Golitko and Feinman 2015) in order to understand the relative importance of the connections.”

    From Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Golitko and Feinman 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 155

  1. Aimers, J. J. (2007). What Maya collapse? Terminal classic variation in the Maya lowlands. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 329–377. · DOI
  2. Alderson, A. S., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology., 109(4), 811–851. · DOI
  3. Andrews, A. P., Andrews, E. W., & Robles Castellanos, F. (2003). The Northern Maya collapse and its aftermath. Ancient Mesoamerica, 14, 151–156. · DOI
  4. Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Plume.
  5. Berdan, F. F. (1989). Trade and markets in precapitalist states. In S. Plattner (Ed.), Economic anthropology (pp. 78–107). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  6. Berdan, F. F. (2003). The economy of Postclassic Mesoamerica. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 93–95). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  7. Berdan, F. F., & Smith, M. E. (2003). The Aztec empire. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 67–72). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  8. Berdan, F. F., Blanton, R. E., Boone, E. H., Hodge, M. G., Smith, M. E., & Umbarger, E. (1996). Aztec imperial strategies. Dumbarton Oaks: Washington D.C.
  9. Berdan, F. F., Masson, M. A., Gasco, J., & Smith, M. E. (2003). An international economy. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 96–108). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  10. Bhattacharya, K., Mukherjee, G., Saramäki, J., Kaski, K., & Manna, S.S. (2008). The international trade network: weighted network analysis and modelling. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P2002 doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/02/P02002 . · DOI
  11. Blanton, R. E. (2013). Cooperation and the moral economy of the marketplace. In K. G. Hirth & J. Pillsbury (Eds.), Merchants, markets, and exchange in the pre-Columbian world (pp. 23–48). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  12. Blanton, R. E., & Fargher, L. F. (2012). Market cooperation and the evolution of the pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican world-system. In S. J. Babones & C. Chase-Dunn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of world-systems analysis (pp. 11–20). London: Routledge.
  13. Blanton, R. E., & Feinman, G. M. (1984). The Mesoamerican world system. American Anthropologist, 86, 673–682. · DOI
  14. Blanton, R. E., Kowalewski, S. A., Feinman, G., & Appel, J. (1993). Ancient Mesoamerica: A comparison of change in three regions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., & Peregrine, P. N. (1996). A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology, 37(1), 1–14. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Blanton, R. E., Fargher, L. F., & Heredia Espinoza, V. Y. (2005). The Mesoamerican world of goods and its transformations. In R. E. Blanton (Ed.), Settlement, subsistence, and social complexity: Essays honoring the legacy of Jeffrey R. Parsons (pp. 260–295). Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California.
  17. Blomster, J. P., Neff, H., & Glascock, M. D. (2005). Olmec pottery production and export in ancient Mexico determined through elemental analysis. Science, 307, 1068–1072. · DOI
  18. Boone, E. H., & Smith, M. E. (2003). Postclassic international styles and symbol sets. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 186–193). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  19. Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28, 124–136. · DOI
  20. Braswell, G. E. (2003). Obsidian exchange spheres. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 131–158). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  21. Braswell, G. E., Clark, J. E., Aoyama, K., McKillop, H. I., & Glascock, M. D. (2000). Determining the geological provenance of obsidian artifacts from the Maya region: a test of the efficacy of visual sourcing. Latin American Antiquity, 11(3), 269–282. · DOI
  22. Brughmans, T. (2013). Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20, 623–662. · DOI
  23. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Carballo, D. M. (2013). The social organization of craft production and interregional exchange at Teotihuacan. In K. G. Hirth & J. Pillsbury (Eds.), Merchants, markets, and exchange in the pre-Columbian world (pp. 113–140). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  25. Carrasco, P. (2001). Economic organization and development. In D. Carrasco (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of Mesoamerican cultures: The civilizations of Mexico and Central America (pp. 363–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Chase, D. Z., & Chase, A. F. (1982). Yucatec influence in terminal classic Northern Belize. American Antiquity, 47(3), 596–614. · DOI
  27. Chase, D. Z., & Chase, A. F. (2006). Framing the Maya collapse: Continuity, discontinuity, method, and practice in the Classic to Postclassic Southern Maya lowlands. In G. M. Schwartz & J. J. Nichols (Eds.), After collapse: The regeneration of complex societies (pp. 168–187). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  28. Clark, J. E. (1986). From mountains to molehills: A critical review of Teotihuacan’s obsidian industry. In B. L. Isaac (Ed.), Research in economic anthropology supplement 2 (pp. 23–74). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
  29. Cobean, R. H. (2002). A world of obsidian: the mining and trade of a volcanic glass in ancient Mexico. Serie Arqueología de México. Mexico City: Intituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia/University of Pittsburgh.
  30. Cochrane, E. E., & Lipo, C. P. (2010). Phylogenetic analyses of Lapita decoration do not support branching evolution or regional population structure during colonization of Remote Oceania. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3889–3902. · DOI
  31. Collar, A. (2007). Network theory and religious innovation. Mediterranean Historical Review, 22(1), 149–162. · DOI
  32. Collar, A. (2013). Re-thinking Jewish ethnicity through social network analysis. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction (pp. 223–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Coward, F. (2013). Grounding the net: Social networks, material culture and geography in the Epipalaeolithic and Early Neolithic of the Near East (~21,000–6,000 cal BCE). In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction (pp. 247–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Cowgill, G. L. (1997). State and society at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 129–161. · DOI
  35. Dahlin, B. H., Jensen, C. T., Terry, R. T., Wright, D. R., Beach, T., & Magnoni, A. (2007). In search of an ancient Maya market. Latin American Antiquity, 18, 363–384. · DOI
  36. Daneels, A. (1997). Settlement history in the lower Cotaxtla Basin. In B. L. Stark & P. J. Arnold III (Eds.), Olmec to Aztec: Settlement patterns in the ancient Gulf Lowlands (pp. 206–252). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  37. Danielson, J.J., & Gesch, D.B. (2011). Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 1011-1073. · DOI
  38. Darling, J.A. (1998). Obsidian distribution and exchange in the north-central frontier of Mesoamerica. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  39. DeJordy, R., Borgatti, S. P., Roussin, C., & Halgin, D. S. (2007). Visualizing proximity data. Field Methods, 19(3), 239–263. · DOI
  40. Diehl, R. A., & Berlo, J. C. (Eds.). (1989). Mesoamerica after the decline of Teotihuacan A.D. 700–900. Washington D.C: Dumbarton Oaks.
  41. Dreiss, M. L., & Brown, D. O. (1989). Obsidian exchange patterns in Belize. In P. A. McAnany & B. L. Isaac (Eds.), Research in economic anthropology supplement 4 (pp. 57–90). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
  42. Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J., & Shiavo, S. (2010). The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 479–514. · DOI
  43. Feinman, G. M. (1999). Rethinking our assumptions: Economic specialization at the household scale in Ancient Ejutla, Oaxaca, Mexico. In J. M. Skibo & G. M. Feinman (Eds.), Pottery and people: A dynamic interaction (pp. 81–98). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  44. Feinman, G. M., & Garraty, C. P. (2010). Preindustrial markets and marketing: archaeological perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 167–191. · DOI
  45. Feinman, G. M., & Nicholas, L. M. (2010). A multiscalar perspective on market exchange in the Classic-Period Valley of Oaxaca. In C. P. Garraty & B. L. Stark (Eds.), Archaeological approaches to market exchange in ancient societies (pp. 85–98). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
  46. Feinman, G. M., & Nicholas, L. M. (2012). The Late Prehispanic economy of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico: weaving threads from data, theory, and subsequent history. In T. Matejowsky & D. C. Wood (Eds.), Political economy, neoliberalism, and the prehistoric economies of Latin America. Research in Economic Anthropology, vol. 32 (pp. 225–258). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Feinman, G. M., & Nicholas, L. M. (2013). Settlement patterns of the Ejutla Valley, Oaxaca, Mexico: A diachronic macroscale perspective. Fieldiana, Anthropology 43. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.
  48. Finley, M. I. (1999). The ancient economy. Berkeley: University of California Press. · DOI
  49. Flannery, K. V., & Marcus, J. (1994). Early formative pottery of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Museum of Anthropology, Memoirs 27. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. · DOI
  50. Frank, A. G. (1993). Bronze age world system cycles. Current Anthropology, 34(4), 383–429. · DOI
  51. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35–41. · DOI
  52. García-Des Lauriers, C. (2007). Proyecto Arqueológico Los Horcones: investigating the Teotihuacan Presence on the Pacific Coast of Chiapas, Mexico. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California Riverside.
  53. Garlaschelli, D., & Loffredo, M. I. (2004). Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 93, 268701. · DOI
  54. Garlaschelli, D., & Loffredo, M. I. (2005). Structure and evolution of the world trade network. Physica A, 355, 138–144. · DOI
  55. Garraty, C. P., & Stark, B. L. (Eds.). (2010). Archaeological approaches to market exchange in ancient societies. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
  56. Gasco, J., & Voorhies, B. (1989). The ultimate tribute: The role of Soconusco as an Aztec tributary. In B. Voorhies (Ed.), Ancient trade and tribute: Economies of the Soconusco region of Mesoamerica (pp. 48–95). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  57. Glascock, M. D. (2002). Obsidian provenance research in the Americas. Accounts of Chemical Research, 35, 611–617. · DOI
  58. Glascock, M. D., Braswell, G. E., & Cobean, R. H. (1998). A systematic approach to obsidian source characterization. In M. S. Shackley (Ed.), Advances in archaeological and museum science, Volume 3 (pp. 15–66)). New York: Plenum Press.
  59. Golitko, M., Meierhoff, J., Feinman, G. M., & Williams, P. R. (2012). Complexities of collapse: the evidence of Maya obsidian as revealed by social network graphical analysis. Antiquity, 86, 507–523. · DOI
  60. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Grove, D. C. (1987). Chalcatzingo in a broader perspective. In D. C. Grove (Ed.), Ancient Chalcatzingo (pp. 434–442). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  62. Grove, D. C. (1989). Chalcatzingo and its Olmec connection. In R. J. Sharer & D. C. Grove (Eds.), Regional perspectives on the Olmec (pp. 122–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  63. Grube, N., & Krochock, R. J. (2007). Reading between the lines: Hieroglyphic texts from Chichén Itzá and its neighbors. In J. K. Kowalski & C. Kirsten-Graham (Eds.), Twin Tollans: Chichén Itzá, Tula, and the Epiclassic to early Postclassic Mesoamerican World. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection: Washington, D.C.
  64. Gutiérrez, G. (2013). Negotiating Aztec tributary demands in the tribute record of Tlapa. In K. G. Hirth & J. Pillsbury (Eds.), Merchants, markets, and exchange in the Pre-Columbian World (pp. 141–167). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  65. Hammond, N. (1972). Obsidian trade routes in the Mayan area. Science, 178(4065), 1092–1093. · DOI
  66. Hanneman, G. H., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.
  67. He, J., & Deem, M. W. (2010). Structure and response in the world trade network. Physical Review Letters, 105(198701), 1–4.
  68. Healan, D. M. (2007). New perspectives on Tula’s obsidian industry and its relationship to Chichén Itzá. In J. K. Kowalski & C. Kristin-Graham (Eds.), Twin Tollans: Chichén Itzá, Tula and the Epiclassic to early Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 429–448). Washington, D.C: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  69. Hirth, K. G. (1978). Interregional trade and the formation of prehistoric gateway communities. American Antiquity, 43(1), 35–45. · DOI
  70. Hirth, K. G. (1996). Political economy and archaeology: perspectives on exchange and production. Journal of Archaeological Research, 4(3), 203–239. · DOI
  71. Hirth, K.G. (Ed.) (2009). Housework: craft production and domestic economy in Ancient Mesoamerica. Archaeological Papers 19. Washington D.C. American Anthropological Association. · DOI
  72. Hirth, K. G. (2013). The merchant’s world: Commercial diversity and economics of interregional exchange in highland Mesoamerica. In K. G. Hirth & J. Pillsbury (Eds.), Merchants, markets, and exchange in the Pre-Columbian World (pp. 85–112). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  73. Hirth, K. G., & Pillsbury, J. (2013). Merchants, markets, and exchange in the Pre-Colombian world. In K. G. Hirth & J. Pillsbury (Eds.), Merchants, markets, and exchange in the Pre-Columbian world (pp. 1–22). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  74. Hodder, I., & Orton, C. (1976). Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  75. Hopkins, K. (2005). Rome, taxes, rent, and trade. In W. Scheidel & S. Von Reden (Eds.), The ancient economy (pp. 190–232). New York: Routledge.
  76. Kali, R., Méndez F., & Reyes, J. (2007). Trade Structure and Economic Growth. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 16(2), 245–269. · DOI
  77. Kali, R., & Reyes, J. (2007). The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 595–620. · DOI
  78. Kennett, D. J., Breitenbach, S. F. M., Aquino, V. V., Asmerom, Y., Awe, J., Baldini, J. U. L., et al. (2012). Development and disintegration of Maya political systems in response to climate change. Science, 38, 788–791. · DOI
  79. Kepecs, S. (2007). Chichén Itzá, Tula and the Epiclassic/Early Postclassic Mesoamerican world system. In J. K. Kowalski & C. Kristin-Graham (Eds.), Twin Tollans: Chichén Itzá, Tula and the Epiclassic to Early Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 129–150). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  80. Kepecs, S., Feinman, G., & Boucher, S. (1994). Chichén Itzá and its hinterland. Ancient Mesoamerica, 5, 141–158. · DOI
  81. Kick, E. L., & Davis, B. L. (2001). World-system structure and change: an analysis of global networks and economic growth across two time periods. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1561–1578. · DOI
  82. Kim, S., & Shin, E.-H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: a social network analysis. Social Forces, 81(2), 445–471. · DOI
  83. King, S. M. (2008). Interregional networks of the Coastal Oaxacan Early Postclassic. In J. A. Blomster (Ed.), After Monte Albán: Transformation and negotiation in Oaxaca, Mexico (pp. 255–291). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
  84. Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  85. Knappett, C. (Ed.). (2013). Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  86. Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis, second edition. Quantitative applications in the social sciences 154. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  87. Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247–268. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Love, M. (2007). Recent research in the southern highlands and pacific coast of Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 275–328. · DOI
  89. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (2004). The industrial revolution: past and future. The Region, 18(1), 4.
  90. Mahutga, M. C. (2002). The persistence of structural inequality? A network analysis of international trade, 1965-2000. Social Forces, 854(4), 1863–1889. · DOI
  91. Mallory, J. K. (1986). “Workshops” and “Specialized Production” in the production of Maya Chert tools: a response to Shafer and Hester. American Antiquity, 51, 152–158. · DOI
  92. Masson, M. A., & Freidel, D. A. (2012). An argument for classic era Maya market exchange. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 31, 455–484. · DOI
  93. Menze, B. H., & Ur, J. A. (2012). Mapping patterns of long-term settlement in Northern Mesopotamia at a large scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(14), E778–E787. · DOI · Paper page
  94. Michels, J.W. (1979). The Kaminaljuyu Chiefdom. The Pennsylvania State University Press Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyu.
  95. Milbrath, S., & Peraza Lope, C. (2003). Revisiting Mayapan: Mexico’s last Maya capital. Ancient Mesoamerica, 14(1), 1–46. · DOI
  96. Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, W. R., Jr., Roberts, J. M., Jr., Hill, J. B., et al. (2013a). Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 5785–5790. · DOI
  97. Mills, B. J., Roberts, J. M., Jr., Clark, J. J., Haas, W. R., Jr., Huntley, D., & Peeples, M. A. (2013b). The dynamics of social networks in the Late Prehispanic US Southwest. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction (pp. 181–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  98. Minc, L. D. (2006). Monitoring regional market systems in prehistory: models, methods, and metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25, 82–116. · DOI
  99. Mizoguchi, K. (2009). Nodes and edges: a network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 14–26. · DOI
  100. Moholy-Nagy, H., Meierhoff, J., Golitko, M., & Kestle, C. (2013). An analysis of pXRF obsidian source attributions from Tikal Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity, 24(1), 72–97. · DOI
  101. Morris, I. (2005). The ancient economy: Evidence and models. In J. G. Manning & I. Morris (Eds.), Social science history (pp. 91–126). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  102. Munson, J. (2013). From metaphors to practice: operationalizing network concepts for archaeological stratigraphy. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. doi: 10.1007/s10816-013-9181-8 . · DOI
  103. Munson, J. L., & Macri, M. J. (2009). Sociopolitical network interactions: a case study of the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 424–438. · DOI
  104. Nelson, F. W. (1985). Summary of the results of analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Maya lowlands. Scanning Electron Microscopy, 2, 631–649.
  105. Oatley, T., Winecoff, W. K., Pennock, A., & Danzman, S. B. (2013). The political economy of global finance: a network model. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 133–153. · DOI
  106. Oka, R., & Kusimba, C. M. (2008). The archaeology of trading systems, part 1: towards a new trade synthesis. Journal of Archaeological Research, 16, 339–395. · DOI
  107. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. · DOI
  108. Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319. · DOI
  109. Peeples, M. A., & Haas, W. R., Jr. (2013). Brokerage and social capital in the Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. American Anthropologist, 115(2), 232–247. · DOI
  110. Peeples, M. A., & Roberts, J. M., Jr. (2013). To binarize or not to binarize: relational data and the construction of archaeological networks. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 3001–3010. · DOI
  111. Peregrine, P. (1991). A graph-theoretic approach to the evolution of Cahokia. American Antiquity, 56(1), 66–75. · DOI
  112. Pitts, F.R. (1978/1979). The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited. Social Networks 1: 285-292. · DOI
  113. Plog, S. (1976). Measurement of prehistoric interaction between communities. In K. V. Flannery (Ed.), The early Mesoamerican village (pp. 255–271). New York: Academic Press.
  114. Plunket, P., & Uruñuela, G. (2005). Recent research in Puebla prehistory. Journal of Archaeological Research, 13, 89–127. · DOI
  115. Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M., & Pearson, H. W. (Eds.). (1957). Trade and market in the early empires. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
  116. Pollard, H. B. (2003). The Tarascan empire. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 78–86). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  117. Pollard, H. B., & Smith, M. E. (2003). The Aztec/Tarascan border. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 87–90). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  118. Pool, C. A. (2009). Asking more and better questions: Olmec archaeology for the Next Katun. Ancient Mesoamerica, 20(2), 241–252. · DOI
  119. Rathje, W. L. (1973). Classic Maya development and denouement: A research design. In T. P. Culbert (Ed.), The classic Maya collapse (pp. 405–456). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  120. Renfrew, C. (1977). Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution. In T. K. Earle & J. E. Ericson (Eds.), Exchange systems in prehistory (pp. 71–90). New York: Academic Press. · DOI
  121. Ringle, W. M., Gallareta Negrón, T., & Bey, G. J., III. (1998). The return of Quetzalcoatl: evidence for the spread of a world religion during the Epiclassic period. Ancient Mesoamerica, 9(2), 183–232. · DOI
  122. Sabloff, J. A. (2007). It depends on how we look at things: new perspectives on the postclassic period in the Northern Maya lowlands. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 151(1), 11–26.
  123. Sacks, M. A., Ventresca, M. J., & Uzzi, B. (2001). Global institutions and networks: contingent change in the structure of world trade advantage, 1965–1980. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1579–1601. · DOI
  124. Sanders, W. T. (1956). The Central Mexican symbiotic region. In G. R. Willey (Ed.), Prehistoric settlement patterns in the new world (pp. 115–127). New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 23.
  125. Sanders, W. T., & Michels, J. W. (Eds.). (1977). Teotihuacan and Kaminaljuyú: A study in prehistoric culture contact. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
  126. Sanders, W. T., & Price, B. J. (1968). Mesoamerica: The evolution of a civilization. New York: Random House.
  127. Sanders, W. T., & Santley, R. S. (1983). A tale of three cities: Energetics and urbanization in Pre-Hispanic Central Mexico. In E. Z. Vogt & R. M. Leventhal (Eds.), Prehistoric settlement patterns: Essays in honor of Gordon R. Willey (pp. 243–291). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  128. Sanders, W. T., & Webster, D. (1988). The Mesoamerican urban tradition. American Anthropologist, 90(3), 521–546. · DOI
  129. Santley, R. S. (1983). Obsidian trade and Teotihuacan influence in Mesoamerica. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), High-lowland interaction in Mesoamerica: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 69–124). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  130. Santley, R. S. (1984). Obsidian exchange, economic stratification, and the evolution of complex society in the Basin of Mexico. In K. G. Hirth (Ed.), Trade and exchange in early Mesoamerica (pp. 43–86). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  131. Santley, R. S. (1986). Prehispanic roadways, transport network geometry, and Aztec Politico-Economic Organization in the Basin of Mexico. In B. L. Isaac (Ed.), Economic aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 2 (pp. 223–244). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
  132. Santley, R. S. (2007). The prehistory of the Tuxtlas. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  133. Santley, R. S., Kerley, J. M., & Kneebone, R. R. (1986). Obsidian working, long-distance exchange, and the politico-economic organization of early states in Central Mexico. In B. L. Isaac (Ed.), Economic aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 2 (pp. 101–132). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
  134. Schnettler, S. (2009). A structured overview of 50 years of small-world research. Social Networks, 31, 165–178. · DOI
  135. Scholnick, J. B., Munson, J. L., & Macri, M. J. (2013). Positioning power in a multi-relational framework: A social network analysis of classic Maya political rhetoric. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction (pp. 95–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  136. Shaw, L. C. (2012). The elusive Maya marketplace: an archaeological consideration of the evidence. Journal of Archaeological Research, 20, 117–155. · DOI
  137. Sindbæk, S. M. (2007). The small world of the Vikings: networks in early Medieval communication and exchange. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 40(1), 59–74. · DOI
  138. Smith, M. E. (2003a). Key commodities. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 117–125). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  139. Smith, M. E. (2003b). Information networks in Postclassic Mesoamerica. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 181–185). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  140. Smith, M. E. (2004). The archaeology of ancient state economies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 73–102. · DOI · Paper page
  141. Smith, M. E. (2007). Tula and Chichén Itzá: Are we asking the right questions? In J. K. Kowalski & C. Kristin-Graham (Eds.), Twin Tollans: Chichén Itzá, Tula and the Epiclassic to early Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 579–618). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection.
  142. Smith, M. E., & Berdan, F. F. (2003). Spatial structure of the Mesoamerican world system. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The Postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 21–31). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  143. Steward, J. H. (1949). Cultural causality and law: a trial formulation of the development of early civilizations. American Anthropologist, 51(1), 1–27. · DOI
  144. Stoltman, J. B., Marcus, J., Flannery, K. V., Burton, J. H., & Moyle, R. G. (2005). Petrographic evidence shows that pottery exchange between the Olmec and their neighbors was two-way. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 102(32), 11213–11218. · DOI
  145. Terrell, J. E. (2013). Social network analysis and the practice of history. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New regional approaches to interaction (pp. 17–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  146. Turchin, P., & Hall, T. D. (2003). Spatial synchrony among and within world-systems: insights from theoretical ecology. Journal of World-Systems Research, IX(I), 37–64. · DOI
  147. Turner, B. L., II, & Sabloff, J. A. (2012). Classic period collapse of the Central Maya Lowlands: insights about human-environment relationships for sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(35), 13908–13914. · DOI
  148. Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis. Structural analysis in the social sciences 27 (pp. 98–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  149. Watts, D. J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493–527. · DOI · Paper page
  150. Webb, M. C. (1973). The Péten Maya decline viewed in the perspective of state formation. In T. P. Culbert (Ed.), The Classic Maya collapse (pp. 391–404). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  151. Wey, T., Blumstein, D. T., Shen, W., & Jordán, F. (2008). Social network analysis of animal behavior: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour, 75, 333–344. · DOI
  152. Willey, G. R. (1991). Horizontal integration and regional diversity: an alternating process in the rise of civilizations. American Antiquity, 56, 197–215. · DOI
  153. Wittfogel, K. (1957). Oriental despotism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  154. Woodfill, K. S., & Andrieu, C. (2012). Tikal’s early classic domination of the great western trade route: ceramic, lithic, and iconographic evidence. Ancient Mesoamerica, 23(2), 189–209. · DOI
  155. Zeitlan, R. N. (1982). Toward a more comprehensive model of interregional commodity distribution: political variables and prehistoric obsidian procurement in Mesoamerica. American Antiquity, 47(2), 260–275. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Golitko, M., & Feinman, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-05-07
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
206-247
ISSN
  • 1072-5369
  • 1573-7764
DOI
10.1007/s10816-014-9211-1
Cited by
109
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review