CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Amazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeological Research and Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Settlement Patterns and Community Delimitation in Chibcha Chiefdoms of Colombia and Panama

Rodríguez, Luis Miguel Soto·2026·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
DOI 10.1007/s10816-026-09767-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-026-09767-3

Cites

51 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Berrey, C. A. (2013). Estructuras de interacción y el desarrollo de las sociedades complejas tempranas en el sur de América Central y norte de Suramérica. In S. D. Palumbo, A. M. Boada Rivas, W. A. Locascio, & A. C. J. Menzies (Eds.), Multiscalar approaches to studying social organization and change in the Isthmo-Colombian area = Enfoques de escala múltiple en el estudio de la organización social y el cambio en el área istmo-colombiana (pp. 2–14). Center for Comparative Archaeology, University of Pittsburgh.
  2. Boada, A. M. (2007). The evolution of social hierarchy in a Muisca chiefdom of the Northern Andes of Colombia. University of Pittsburgh.
  3. Boada, A. M. (2025). Archaeology of the Bogotá chiefdom and its predecessors / Arqueología del cacicazgo de Bogotá y sus predecesores. University of Pittsburgh Center for Comparative Archaeology.
  4. Boada Rivas, A. M. (2013). From small household clusters to the central place of the Bogotá chiefdom (Colombia). In S. D. Palumbo, A. M. Boada Rivas, W. A. Locascio, & A. C. J. Menzies (Eds.), Multiscalar approaches to studying social organization and change in the Isthmo-Colombian area (pp. 39–70). Center for Comparative Archaeology, University of Pittsburgh.
  5. Brughmans, T., & Peeples, M. A. (2017). Trends in archaeological network research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Historical Network Research, 1, 1–24.
  6. Carneiro, R. L. (1981). Chiefdom: Precursor of the state. In G. D. Jones & R. R. Kautz (Eds.), The transition to statehood in the New World (pp. 37–79). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Cooke, R. G., & Ranere, A. J. (1992). The origin of wealth and hierarchy in the Central Region of Panama (12,000-2,000 BP), with observations on its relevance to the history and phylogeny of Chibchan-speaking polities in Panama and elsewhere. In F. W. Lange (Ed.), Wealth and hierarchy in the Intermediate Area (pp. 243–316). Dumbarton Oaks.
  8. Dever, A. (2023). Domestic space, architecture, and demography in the Tairona Area, Colombia: Estimating the size and centrality of communities in the Tairona chiefdoms. Cacicazgos en las Américas: Estudios en homenaje a Robert D. Drennan (pp. 227–258). Editorial UPTC; Editorial UNIMAG.
  9. Drennan, R. D. (2006). Métodos de campo y la base de datos. In R. D. Drennan (Ed.), Prehispanic chiefdoms in the Valle de la Plata, Volume 5: Regional settlement patterns / Cacicazgos prehispánicos del Valle de la Plata, Tomo 5: Patrones de asentamiento regionales (pp. 14–29). University of Pittsburgh.
  10. Drennan, R. D. (2009). Statistics for archaeologists: A commonsense approach (2nd ed). Springer.
  11. Drennan, R. D. (2012). El Área Intermedia, el cacicazgo y la investigación de la dinámica del cambio social. In V. González Fernández (Ed.), Arqueología en el Área Intermedia (pp. 413–419). Fondo Editorial ICANH.
  12. Drennan, R. D., Berrey, C. A., & Peterson, C. E. (2023). Desigualdad y poder desde hace más de 8 000 años en el continente americano y China: Una visión desde la antropología. In L. Arsovka (Ed.), América Latina y el Caribe-China. Historia, cultura y aprendizaje del chino 2022 (pp. 79–101). Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe.
  13. Drennan, R. D., González, V. F., & Sánchez, C. (2018). Patrones de asentamiento regional en El Alto Magdalena: La zona de San Agustín-Isnos. University of Pittsburgh, Center for Comparative Archaeology.
  14. Drennan, R. D., & Peterson, C. E. (2009). La comunidad y el cacicazgo: Un estudio comparativo de patrones de asentamiento regional en el Alto Magdalena, el Valle de Oaxaca, y Mongolia Interior. In C. A. Sánchez (Ed.), Economía, prestigio y poder: Perspectivas desde la arqueología (pp. 168–205). Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.
  15. Ducke, B. (2015). Spatial cluster detection in archaeology: Current theory and practice. In J. A. Barceló & I. Bogdanović (Eds.), Mathematics and archaeology (pp. 352–368). Taylor & Francis.
  16. Earle, T. K. (2019). Warfare and the political economy in prehistory [Conference presentation]. WESIPS Conference, Seville, Spain.
  17. Fried, M. H. (1967). The evolution of political society: An essay in political anthropology. Random House.
  18. Giraldo, S. (2021). Señores de los parajes nevados: Política, lugar y transformaciones del paisaje en dos pueblos taironas de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia (1st ed). ICANH.
  19. González, V. F. (2012). Arqueología en el Área Intermedia. In V. F. González (Ed.), Arqueología en el Área Intermedia (pp. 11–14). Fondo Editorial ICANH.
  20. Haller, M. J. (2008). Asiento Viejo and the development of the Rio Parita chiefdom. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Anthropology.
  21. Haller, M. (2023). The rise of the Cubitá chiefdoms: A multiscalar perspective from the Parita River Valley, Panamá. In P. M. Argüello, J. C. Vargas, & C. H. Langebaek (Eds.), Cacicazgos en las Américas: Estudios en homenaje a Robert D. Drennan (1st ed., pp. 43–76). Editorial UPTC; Editorial UNIMAG.
  22. Herzog, I. (2014). A review of case studies in archaeological least-cost analysis. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 25, 223–239.
  23. Jaramillo, L. G. (2023). “Escalando” las sociedades cacicales en Colombia: Una aproximación entre muiscas y quimbayas. In P. M. Argüello, J. C. Vargas, & C. H. Langebaek (Eds.), Cacicazgos en las Américas: Estudios en homenaje a Robert D. Drennan (pp. 145–160). Editorial UPTC; Editorial UNIMAG.
  24. Ji, X., Machiraju, R., Ritter, A., & Yen, P. Y. (2015). Examining the distribution, modularity, and community structure in article networks for systematic reviews. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2015, 1927–1936.
  25. Johnson, G. A. (1982). Organizational structure and scalar stress. In C. Renfrew, M. J. Rowlands, & B. A. Segraves-Whallon (Eds.), Theory and explanation in archaeology: The Southampton Conference (pp. 389–421). Academic Press.
  26. Kantner, J. (2012). Realism, reality, and routes: Evaluating cost-surface and cost-path algorithms. In D. A. White & S. L. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least cost analysis of social landscapes: Archaeological case studies (pp. 225–238). University of Utah Press.
  27. Lange, F. W. (1984). A cultural geography of Precolumbian Lower Central America. In F. W. Lange & D. Z. Stone (Eds.), The archaeology of Lower Central America (pp. 33–60). University of New Mexico Press.
  28. Langebaek, C. H. (2019). Los muiscas: La historia de los hijos del barro. Debate.
  29. Marcus, J. (2000). Toward an archaeology of communities. In M. A. Canuto & J. Yaeger (Eds.), The archaeology of communities: A New World perspective (pp. 231–242). Routledge.
  30. Mignone, P. (2020). Evaluación crítica de la eficacia del camino de menor coste para el estudio predictivo del Qhapaq Ñan / Critical assessment of the efficacy of the least-cost path in the predictive study of Qhapaq Ñan. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena, 53(1), 5–20.
  31. Padilla-Iglesias, C., & Bischoff, R. J. (2024). Hunter-gatherer mobility patterns influence the reconstruction of social networks from archaeological assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 59, Article 104798.
  32. Palumbo, S. D., Boada Rivas, A. M., Locascio, W. A., & Menzies, A. C. J. (2013). Conclusion. In S. D. Palumbo, A. M. Boada Rivas, W. A. Locascio, & A. C. J. Menzies (Eds.), Multiscalar approaches to studying social organization and change in the Isthmo-Colombian area (pp. 154–165). Center for Comparative Archaeology, University of Pittsburgh.
  33. Palumbo, S. D., & Locascio, W. A. (2023). The village people. In P. M. Argüello, J. C. Vargas, & C. H. Langebaek (Eds.), Cacicazgos en las Américas: Estudios en homenaje a Robert D. Drennan (1st ed., pp. 209–226). Editorial UPTC; Editorial UNIMAG.
  34. Rademaker, K., Reid, D. A., & Bromley, G. R. M. (2012). Connecting the dots: Least cost analysis, paleogeography, and the search for Paleoindian sites in southern highland Peru. In D. A. White & S. L. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least cost analysis of social landscapes: Archaeological case studies (pp. 32–45). University of Utah Press.
  35. Roberts, J. M., Dorshorst, E., Yin, Y., Peeples, M. A., Breiger, R. L., & Mills, B. J. (2023). Sampling variability and centrality-score comparisons in archaeological network analysis: A case study of the San Pedro Valley, Arizona. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 51, Article 104100.
  36. Seifried, R. M., & Gardner, C. A. M. (2019). Reconstructing historical journeys with least-cost analysis: Colonel William Leake in the Mani Peninsula, Greece. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 24, 391–411.
  37. Service, E. R. (1962). Primitive social organization: An evolutionary perspective. Random House.
  38. Service, E. R. (1975). Origins of the state and civilization: The process of cultural evolution (1st ed). Norton.
  39. Sol, R., & Murillo, M. (2023). El tamaño de la población en Costa Rica durante el último periodo precolombino: Una aproximación desde la arqueología. In P. M. Argüello, J. C. Vargas, & C. H. Langebaek (Eds.), Cacicazgos en las Américas: Estudios en homenaje a Robert D. Drennan (1st ed., pp. 19–42). Editorial UPTC; Editorial UNIMAG.
  40. Soto Rodríguez, L. M. (2020). Organización de la producción cerámica prehispánica en la microcuenca El Congo, municipio de Ciénaga, Santa Marta [Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Externado de Colombia].
  41. Steponaitis, V. P. (1991). Contrasting patterns of Mississippian development. In T. K. Earle (Ed.), Chiefdoms: Power, economy, and ideology. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Terrell, J. E. (1977). Human biogeography in the Solomon Islands. Fieldiana: Anthropology, 68(1), 1–47.
  43. Tobler, W. R. (1993). Three presentations on geographical analysis and modeling. University of California.
  44. Willey, G. R. (1971). An introduction to American archaeology (Vol. 2, South America). Prentice-Hall.
  45. Yaeger, J., & Canuto, M. A. (2000). Introducing an archaeology of communities. In M. A. Canuto & J. Yaeger (Eds.), The archaeology of communities: A New World perspective (pp. 1–15). Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez, L. M. S.
ORCID
Rodríguez, Luis Miguel Soto
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2026-02-16
Volume
33
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7764
DOI
10.1007/s10816-026-09767-3
OpenAlex
W7129148136
Cited by
3
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
172.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
Keywords
settlement patterns, social interaction networks, travel cost, spatial hierarchy, site size, spatial agglomeration, network partitioning, modularity, density interpolation, density-based clustering, intermediate area, Río Frío, Fúquene lagoon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review