Cited by 208Graph theory and applicationsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsHistory and advancements in chemistry

Substructural fragments: an universal language to encode reactions, molecular and supramolecular structures

Varnek, A., Fourches, D., Hoonakker, F., Solov’ev, V. P.·2005·Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Abstract

Substructural fragments are proposed as a simple and safe way to encode molecular structures in a matrix containing the occurrence of fragments of a given type. The knowledge retrieved from QSPR modelling can also be stored in that matrix in addition to the information about fragments. Complex supramolecular systems (using special bond types) and chemical reactions (represented as Condensed Graphs of Reactions, CGR) can be treated similarly. The efficiency of fragments as descriptors has been demonstrated in QSPR studies of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds as well as in the analysis of thermodynamic parameters for hydrogen-bonding in some supramolecular complexes. It has also been shown that CGR may be an interesting opportunity to perform similarity searches for chemical reactions. The relationship between the density of information in descriptors/knowledge matrices and the robustness of QSPR models is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10822-005-9008-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fragment descriptors or fingerprints can easily be generated for CGR.

    “In particularly, fragment descriptors or fingerprints can easily be generated for CGR.144”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [144]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varnek, A., Fourches, D., Hoonakker, F., & Solov’ev, V. P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
Varnek, A.
Venue
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Published
2005-09
Volume
19
Issue
9-10
Pages
693-703
ISSN
  • 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4951
OpenAlex
W2059713851
Cited by
208
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
Keywords
molecular descriptors, QSPR, supramolecular complexes, chemical reactions, water solubility
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Hydrogen Bonding, Models, Chemical, Solubility, Thermodynamics, Water, Molecular Structure, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review