Substructural fragments: an universal language to encode reactions, molecular and supramolecular structures
Abstract
Substructural fragments are proposed as a simple and safe way to encode molecular structures in a matrix containing the occurrence of fragments of a given type. The knowledge retrieved from QSPR modelling can also be stored in that matrix in addition to the information about fragments. Complex supramolecular systems (using special bond types) and chemical reactions (represented as Condensed Graphs of Reactions, CGR) can be treated similarly. The efficiency of fragments as descriptors has been demonstrated in QSPR studies of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds as well as in the analysis of thermodynamic parameters for hydrogen-bonding in some supramolecular complexes. It has also been shown that CGR may be an interesting opportunity to perform similarity searches for chemical reactions. The relationship between the density of information in descriptors/knowledge matrices and the robustness of QSPR models is discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fragment descriptors or fingerprints can easily be generated for CGR.
“In particularly, fragment descriptors or fingerprints can easily be generated for CGR.144”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [144]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139 · see citing works
Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions
Golub, G. H., & Reinsch, C. (1970) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02163027 · Cited by 2,929 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citationComputer‐Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning
Szymkuć, S., Gajewska, E. P., Klucznik, T., Molga, K., Dittwald, P., Startek, M., Bajczyk, M., & Grzybowski, B. A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506101 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide
David, L., Thakkar, A., Mercado, R., & Engkvist, O. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00460-5 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Fourches, D., Barnes, J. C., Day, N. C., Bradley, P., Reed, J. Z., & Tropsha, A. (2010) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx900326k · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationExpert System for Predicting Reaction Conditions: The Michael Reaction Case
Marcou, G., Aires de Sousa, J., Latino, D. A. R. S., de Luca, A., Horvath, D., Rietsch, V., & Varnek, A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500698a · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationHOONAKKER, F., LACHICHE, N., VARNEK, A., & WAGNER, A. (2011) · International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools · doi:10.1142/s0218213011000140 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>Per Aspera Ad Astra</i> : Application of Simplex Qsar Approach in Antiviral Research
Muratov, E. N., Artemenko, A. G., Varlamova, E. V., Polischuk, P. G., Lozitsky, V. P., Fedchuk, A. S., Lozitska, R. L., Gridina, T. L., Koroleva, L. S., Sil’nikov, V. N., et al. (2010) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.10.194 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Automatized Assessment of Protective Group Reactivity: A Step Toward Big Reaction Data Analysis
Lin, A. I., Madzhidov, T. I., Klimchuk, O., Nugmanov, R. I., Antipin, I. S., & Varnek, A. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00319 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure–reactivity modeling using mixture-based representation of chemical reactions
Polishchuk, P., Madzhidov, T., Gimadiev, T., Bodrov, A., Nugmanov, R., & Varnek, A. (2017) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-017-0044-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Varnek, A., Fourches, D., Hoonakker, F., & Solov’ev, V. P.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Varnek, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 693-703
- ISSN
- 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4951
- OpenAlex
- W2059713851
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
- Keywords
- molecular descriptors, QSPR, supramolecular complexes, chemical reactions, water solubility
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Hydrogen Bonding, Models, Chemical, Solubility, Thermodynamics, Water, Molecular Structure, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Macromolecular Substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review