Cited by 51Computational Drug Discovery MethodsGraph theory and applicationsMachine Learning in Materials Science

Automatized Assessment of Protective Group Reactivity: A Step Toward Big Reaction Data Analysis

Lin, Arkadii I., Madzhidov, Timur I., Klimchuk, Olga, Nugmanov, Ramil I., Antipin, Igor S., Varnek, Alexandre·2016·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

We report a new method to assess protective groups (PGs) reactivity as a function of reaction conditions (catalyst, solvent) using raw reaction data. It is based on an intuitive similarity principle for chemical reactions: similar reactions proceed under similar conditions. Technically, reaction similarity can be assessed using the Condensed Graph of Reaction (CGR) approach representing an ensemble of reactants and products as a single molecular graph, i.e., as a pseudomolecule for which molecular descriptors or fingerprints can be calculated. CGR-based in-house tools were used to process data for 142,111 catalytic hydrogenation reactions extracted from the Reaxys database. Our results reveal some contradictions with famous Greene's Reactivity Charts based on manual expert analysis. Models developed in this study show high accuracy (ca. 90%) for predicting optimal experimental conditions of protective group deprotection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00319

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaction data from public databases is of mixed quality.

    “Generally, reaction data from public databases is of mixed quality.”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [139]

  • Many reactions are stoichiometrically unbalanced, some important data on reaction conditions are missing, and different names are used for the same catalysts or solvents.

    “Many of the reactions are stoichiometrically unbalanced, some important data on reaction conditions are missing, and different names are used for the same catalysts or solvents.139”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [139]

  • Lin et al. used the heuristic that similar reactions proceed under similar conditions to predict optimal reaction conditions.

    “Lin et al.139 used the heuristic that similar reactions proceed under similar conditions to predict optimal reaction conditions.”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [139]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, A. I., Madzhidov, T. I., Klimchuk, O., Nugmanov, R. I., Antipin, I. S., & Varnek, A.
Affiliations
  • Kazan Federal University (RU)
  • Université de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Laboratory of Chemoinformatics and Molecular Modeling, Department of Organic Chemistry, A.M. Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya Str. 18, Kazan, Russia, 420008
Corresponding author
Varnek, Alexandre
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2016-11-08
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
2140-2148
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2540880742
Cited by
51
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • zvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (14-43-00024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
molecular graphs, catalytic hydrogenation, reaction condition prediction
MeSH terms
Automation, Catalysis, Hydroxides, Models, Chemical, Phenols, Solvents, Databases, Factual, Informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review