Sequestration of CaMKII in dendritic spines in silico
Abstract
Calcium calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is sequestered in dendritic spines within seconds upon synaptic stimulation. The program Smoldyn was used to develop scenarios of single molecule CaMKII diffusion and binding in virtual dendritic spines. We first validated simulation of diffusion as a function of spine morphology. Additional cellular structures were then incorporated to simulate binding of CaMKII to the post-synaptic density (PSD); binding to cytoskeleton; or their self-aggregation. The distributions of GFP tagged native and mutant constructs in dissociated hippocampal neurons were measured to guide quantitative analysis. Intra-spine viscosity was estimated from fluorescence recovery after photo-bleach (FRAP) of red fluorescent protein. Intra-spine mobility of the GFP-CaMKIIα constructs was measured, with hundred-millisecond or better time resolution, from FRAP of distal spine tips in conjunction with fluorescence loss (FLIP) from proximal regions. Different FRAP \ FLIP profiles were predicted from our Scenarios and provided a means to differentiate binding to the PSDs from self-aggregation. The predictions were validated by experiments. Simulated fits of the Scenarios provided estimates of binding and rate constants. We utilized these values to assess the role of self-aggregation during the initial response of native CaMKII holoenzymes to stimulation. The computations revealed that self-aggregation could provide a concentration-dependent switch to amplify CaMKI…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A computational study provides evidence that self-association could provide a concentration-dependent switch to amplify CaMKII sequestration in the PSD.
“A computational study provides evidence that self-association could provide a concentration-dependent switch to amplify CaMKII sequestration in the PSD (142).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [142]
Cites
The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: A More Quantitative View
Sheng, M., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation
Bayer, K.-U., De Koninck, P., Leonard, A. S., Hell, J. W., & Schulman, H. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081080 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Shen, K., Teruel, M. N., Subramanian, K., & Meyer, T. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80569-3 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Okamoto, K.-I., Narayanan, R., Lee, S. H., Murata, K., & Hayashi, Y. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701656104 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Otmakhov, N., Tao-Cheng, J.-H., Carpenter, S., Asrican, B., Dosemeci, A., Reese, T. S., & Lisman, J. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2350-04.2004 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Self-citationGlutamate-induced transient modification of the postsynaptic density
Dosemeci, A., Tao-Cheng, J.-H., Vinade, L., Winters, C. A., Pozzo-Miller, L., & Reese, T. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.181336998 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationHudmon, A., LeBel, E., Roy, H., Sik, A., Schulman, H., Waxham, M. N., & De Koninck, P. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4698-04.2005 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“A computational study provides evidence that self-association could provide a concentration-dependent switch to amplify CaMKII sequestration in the PSD (142).”
BackgroundBlackwell, K. T., & Jedrzejewska‐Szmek, J. (2013) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1240 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khan, S., Zou, Y., Amjad, A., Gardezi, A., Smith, C. L., Winters, C., & Reese, T. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
- Lahore University of Management Sciences (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Shahid
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-04-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 581-594
- ISSN
- 0929-5313 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6873
- OpenAlex
- W1994069838
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM49319, R01GM049319)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- CaMKII, dendritic spines, postsynaptic density, self-aggregation, actin cytoskeleton, single-molecule diffusion, spinal mobility, FRAP, c-FLIP, synaptic plasticity, holoenzyme, hippocampal neurons, computational modeling
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Chlorocebus aethiops, Cytoskeleton, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Protein Binding, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, COS Cells, Protein Transport, Dendritic Spines, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2, Primary Cell Culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review