CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Leadership and PracticesEducation and Teacher Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linked to innovation: Shaping an innovative climate through network intentionality and educators' social network position

Moolenaar, Nienke M., Daly, Alan J., Cornelissen, Frank, Liou, Yi-Hwa, Caillier, Stacey, Riordan, Rob, Wilson, Kelly, Cohen, N. Andrew·2014·Journal of Educational Change
DOI 10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Baker-Doyle, K. (2011). The networked teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baumard, P., & Starbuck, W. H. (2005). Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning, 38, 281–298. · DOI
  4. Betts, J. R., & Atkinson, R. C. (2012). Better research needed on the impact of charter schools. Science, 335, 171–172. · DOI
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  6. Borgatti, S., & Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. · DOI
  7. Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., & Everett, M. G. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), 27–36.
  8. Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781. · DOI
  9. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  10. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Burt, R. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19, 355–373. · DOI
  12. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Calantone, R. J., Garcia, R., & Droge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103. · DOI
  14. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. · DOI
  15. Coburn, C. E., Russell, J. L., Kaufman, J. H., & Stein, M. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: Teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 137–182. · DOI
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cornelissen, F., Daly, A. J., Liou, Y., Swet, J. van, Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T.C.M. (2013a). More than a master: Developing, sharing and using knowledge in school-university research networks. Cambridge Journal of Education. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.855170 . · DOI
  18. Cornelissen, F., Van Swet, J., Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T. (2013b). Aspects of school–University research networks that play a role in developing, sharing and using knowledge based on teacher research. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 139–176. · DOI
  19. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25–46. · DOI
  20. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  21. Daft, R., & Becker, S. (1978). Innovation in organizations: Innovation adoption in school organizations. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  22. Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K., Jordan, S., Moolenaar, N. M. & Che, J. (2014). Misalignment and perverse incentives: Examining the politics of district leaders as brokers in the use of research evidence. Educational Policy. doi: 10.1177/0895904813513149 . · DOI
  23. Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N.M., Der-Martirosian, C., & Liou, Y. (in press). Accessing capital resources: Investigating the effects of teacher human and social capital on student achievement. Teachers College Record.
  24. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392–409. · DOI
  25. Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201. · DOI
  26. Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659–669. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Farrell, C., Wohlstetter, P., & Smith, J. (2012). Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Education Policy, 26(4), 499–532. · DOI
  28. Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Mind the gap: Organizational learning and improvement in an underperforming urban system. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 41–71. · DOI
  29. Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171. · DOI
  30. Geijsel, F. P. (2001). Schools and innovations. Conditions fostering the implementation of educational innovations. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press.
  31. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical examination of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896. · DOI
  32. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas & S. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 177–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. · DOI
  33. Hage, J. T. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 597–622. · DOI
  34. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  36. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  37. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Studies, 3, 383–397.
  38. Krishna, A., & Uphoff, N., (2002). Mapping and measuring social capital through assessment of collective action to conserve and develop watersheds in Rajasthan. India. In T. Van Bastelaer (Ed.), The role of social capital in development (pp. 85–88). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Krull, J. L. & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249–277. · DOI
  40. Lake, R. J. (2008). In the eye of the beholder: Charter Schools and Innovation. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 2(2), 115–127. · DOI
  41. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lin, N. (2009). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (8th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 233–262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  44. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Marks, H. M. (1996). School-wide professional community: Teachers work, intellectual quality and commitment. In F. W. Newmann & Associates (Eds), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Lubienski, C. A., & Weitzel, P. C. (2011). Two decades of charter schools. In C. A. Lubienski & P. C. Weitzel (Eds.), The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications (pp. 2–14). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  46. Monge, P. R., Cozzens, M. D., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3, 250–274. · DOI
  47. Moolenaar, N. M. (2010). Ties with potential. Nature, antecedents, and consequences of social networks in school teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  48. Moolenaar, N. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7–39. · DOI
  49. Moolenaar, N. M., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Social networks in education: Exploring the social side of the reform equation. Editorial to the special issue on Social network theory: Teaching, learning, and change. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 1–6. · DOI
  50. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Liou, Y.-H., Siciliano, M., & Bae, S. (2013). Common core, shared beliefs? Teachers’ social network formation and professional beliefs in the context of the Common Core State Standards. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the California Educational Research Association (CERA), December 5–6, Anaheim, CA.
  51. Moolenaar, N., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. (2011a). Ties with potential: Social network Structure and innovation in Dutch schools. Teachers College Record, 113(9), 1983–2017. · DOI
  52. Moolenaar, N. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Social networks, trust, and innovation. How social relationships support trust and innovative climates in Dutch Schools. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  53. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2011b). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. · DOI
  54. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., Karsten, S., & Daly, A. J. (2012). The social fabric of elementary schools: A network typology of social interaction among teachers. Educational Studies, 38(4), 355–371. · DOI
  55. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Nohari, K., & Gulati, S. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 799–825.
  57. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130. · DOI
  59. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576. · DOI
  60. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  61. Penuel, W. R., Sun, M., Frank, K. A., & Gallagher, H. A. (2012). Using social network analysis to study how collegial interactions can augment teacher learning from external professional development. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 103–136. · DOI
  62. Preston, C., Goldring, E., Berends, M., & Cannata, M. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 318–330. · DOI
  63. Sleegers, P. J. C., Den Brok, P., Verbiest, E., Moolenaar, N. M., & Daly, A. J. (2013). Towards conceptual clarity: A multidimensional, multilevel model of professional learning communities in Dutch elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 118–137. · DOI
  64. Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  65. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  66. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  67. Totterdell, P., Holman, D., & Hukin, A. (2008). Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in the propensity to connect with others. Social Networks, 30(4), 283–296. · DOI
  68. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. · DOI
  69. Uphoff, N. (1999). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experiences of participation. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  70. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. · DOI
  71. Van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (1996). Building innovative capacity and leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–699). London, UK: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  72. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1998). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  74. Yasumoto, J. Y., Uekawa, K., & Bidwell, C. E. (2001). The collegial focus and high school students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 181–209. · DOI
  75. Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Cornelissen, F., Liou, Y.-H., Caillier, S., Riordan, R., Wilson, K., & Cohen, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • High Tech High Graduate School of Education (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Moolenaar, Nienke M.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Educational Change
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
99-123
ISSN
  • 1389-2843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1812
DOI
10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4
OpenAlex
W2083823803
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Change (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Teacher Training
Keywords
cognitive social capital, structural social capital, innovative climate, charter schools, teacher collaboration, social network position, teacher perceptions, underserved populations, school innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review