The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 15: HRM (AI) assimilation will positively influence internal relational social capital.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998
In the citing paper
“It also con nects naturally to Nahapiet and Ghoshal's (1998) dimensions: recognition operates on the structural configuration of ties, alignment on the relational and cognitive dimensions of trust and shared meaning, and mobilisation on the combination and exchange through which new value is created.”
From From Social Capital to Organizational Capacity: Activating Relational Resources for School Innovation (2026) · cites this paper as Nahapiet and Ghoshal's (1998)
In the citing paper
“relational SC that engenders norms of obligation, commitment, and reciprocity (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998;Villena et al. 2011) can also promote adherence to extant belief systems.”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998
In the citing paper
“Social capital theorists have observed that social identification is an important facet of relational SC (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998).”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998
In the citing paper
“Potentially, therefore, all three dimensions of SC (structural, relational, and cognitive) are underpinned by social identification processes.”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 · Cited by 6,233
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148667 · Cited by 5,154
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Metadata
- Authors
- Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4230348989
- Cited by
- 7,111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 548 · 2025: 595 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 623 · 2022: 585 · 2021: 540 · 2020: 323 · 2019: 307 · 2018: 279 · 2017: 287 · 2016: 251 · 2015: 303 · 2014: 229 · 2013: 271 · 2012: 222
- FWCI
- 58.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- social capital, intellectual capital, organizational advantage, enterprise competitiveness, knowledge management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
