Cited by 81Risk and Safety AnalysisReliability and Maintenance OptimizationMulti-Criteria Decision Making

Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA

Chang, Kuei-Hu, Chang, Yung-Chia, Lai, Pei-Ting·2014·Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10845-013-0747-9

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, K.-H., Chang, Y.-C., & Lai, P.-T.
Affiliations
  • R.O.C Military Academy (TW)
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Kuei-Hu
Venue
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1413-1427
ISSN
  • 0956-5515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8145
OpenAlex
W1974693995
Cited by
81
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
failure mode and effects analysis, risk priority number, risk assessment, risk prioritization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review