Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RPN alone does not determine whether more action is needed because RPN weights S, O, and D equally.
“The RPN can provide some information about risk, but RPN alone does not determine whether more action is needed because RPN weights S, O, and D equally.”
From Application of Monte Carlo Simulation to Study the Probability of Confidence Level under the PFMEA’s Action Priority (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855 · see citing works
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,960 · see citing works
Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant
Mamdani, E. H. (1974) · Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers · doi:10.1049/piee.1974.0328 · Cited by 4,064 · see citing works
Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis
Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-d · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Failure mode and effects analysis
Teng, S., & Ho, S. (1996) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656719610118151 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Self-citation(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5733 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The CALCULUS of Fuzzy If/Then RULES
Zadeh, L. A. (1993) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78023-3_5 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models
Hawkins, P., & Woollons, D. J. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence in Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0954-1810(97)10011-5 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Failure mode and effects analysis in the U.K. motor industry: A state‐of‐the‐art study
Dale, B. G., & Shaw, P. (1990) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.4680060304 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Further applications of fuzzy logic to reliability assessment and safety analysis
Keller, A. Z., & Kara‐Zaitri, C. (1989) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/0026-2714(89)90627-6 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Using causal reasoning for automated failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
Bell, D., Cox, L., Jackson, S., et al. (2003) · Proceedings, annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium/Proceedings. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium · doi:10.1109/arms.1992.187847 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables
Wang, J., Ruxton, T., & Labrie, C. R. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00094-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Uncertainty Analysis in Quantitative Risk Assessment
Quin, S., & Widera, G. E. O. (1996) · Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology · doi:10.1115/1.2842154 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean
Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Islam, M. S., Nepal, M. P., Skitmore, M., & Attarzadeh, M. (2017) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA
Chang, K.-H., Chang, Y.-C., & Lai, P.-T. (2014) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0747-9 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Sun, J.-J., Yeh, T.-M., & Pai, F.-Y. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10152596 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, K
- Venue
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-29
- ISSN
- 0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009568361
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Keywords
- failure mode and effects analysis, fuzzy logic, reliability improvement, quality assurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
