Cited by 44Planetary Science and ExplorationGlass properties and applicationsCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Manufacture of glass and mirrors from lunar regolith simulant

Open access
Schleppi, Juergen, Gibbons, Joseph, Groetsch, Alexander, Buckman, Jim, Cowley, Aidan, Bennett, Nick·2019·Journal of Materials Science

Abstract

Future planetary surface missions to the Moon or Mars, for example, can be augmented by the use of local materials, in order to reduce launch mass and expand mission capability. Using lunar regolith simulant and heating it within a susceptor-assisted microwave oven, it was possible to manufacture a variety of basaltic glasses. Furthermore, it was possible to shape these glasses by grinding and polishing the surface flat and smooth. Glasses manufactured from different lunar regolith simulants were coated with aluminium or silver, and the reflective properties of the resulting mirrors and uncoated surfaces were measured. It was shown that with a porous and/or smooth surface finish, mirrors could be made that reflect the incident solar light (400 nm–1250 nm) in-between 30% for the worst and 85% for the best samples. The same samples with uncoated surfaces showed to reflect less than 7% of incident solar light in the same wavelength range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10853-018-3101-y

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncoated regolith-derived glass samples reflect less than 7% of incident solar light in the range 400 to 1250 nm.

    “Uncoated samples exhibited lower reflectivity, reflecting less than 7% of the same incident solar light.”

    From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [312]

    The Uncoated samples section reports approximately 4–13% reflectivity across 300–1250 nm, with one sample reaching 28%. The Conclusion gives 5–10% for most samples across 400–1250 nm, again noting the exception. These results contradict the claim that uncoated samples reflect less than 7% throughout that range. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Susceptor-assisted microwave processing is less efficient due to losses of the susceptor-assisted heating.

    “However, this method is less efficient due to the losses of the susceptor-assisted heating.”
  • Mirrors produced from regolith simulants via susceptor-assisted microwave processing with aluminum and silver coatings reflect incident solar light in the range 400 to 1250 nm with reflectivity from 30% to 85%.

    “Resulting mirrors with porous and/or smooth surfaces demonstrated the ability to reflect incident solar light in the range of 400 to 1250 nm , with reflectivity ranging from 30% for the least effective sample to 85% for the most effective.”
  • Susceptor-assisted microwave processing has the advantage of being independent of the composition of regolith, in contrast to regular microwave processing.

    “Susceptor-assisted microwave processing has the advantage of being independent of the composition of regolith, in contrast to regular microwave processing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Barmatz M, Steinfeld D, Anderson M, Winterhalter D (2014) 3d microwave print head approach for processing lunar and mars regolith. In: Lunar and planetary science conference, vol 45, p 1137
  2. Lindsay JF (1976) Lunar stratigraphy and sedimentology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam (Develop- ments in solar system-and space science, no. 3), vol 1, pp 227-287
  3. McLemore C (2009) The need for lunar simulants. In: LPI contributions, vol 1515, p 40
  4. Tarrago M, Royo I, Garcia-Valles M, Martı ´nez S (2016) Nucleation and crystallization of Ca doped basaltic glass for the production of a glass-ceramic material. In: EGU general assembly conference abstracts, vol 18, p 15165
  5. Korsch D (2012) Reflective optics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
  6. Hecht E (1974) Optics. Addison-Wesley, Boston
  7. Danzl R, Helmli F, Scherer S (2009) Focus variation-a new technology for high resolution optical 3d surface metrology. In: The 10th international conference of the slovenian soci- ety for non-destructive testing, pp 484-491
  8. Helmli LR (2011) Focus variation instruments in optical measurement of surface topography, vol 14. Springer, Berlin
  9. Vinogradov A, Nefedov V, Urusov V, Zhavoronkov N (1972) Esca-investigation of lunar regolith from the seas of fertility and tranquility. In: Lunar and planetary science conference proceedings, vol 3, p 1421

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schleppi, J., Gibbons, J., Groetsch, A., Buckman, J., Cowley, A., & Bennett, N.
Affiliations
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
  • European Astronaut Centre (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Schleppi, Juergen
  • Gibbons, Joseph
  • Groetsch, Alexander
  • Buckman, Jim
  • Cowley, Aidan
  • Bennett, Nick
Venue
Journal of Materials Science
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
3726-3747
ISSN
  • 0022-2461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4803
OpenAlex
W2901722277
Cited by
44
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Heriot-Watt University
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1963733)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
lunar regolith simulant, glassmaking, mirrors, microwave heating, glassy basalt, in-situ resource utilization, solar reflectance, aluminum coating, silver coating, Moon, Mars, grinding and polishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review