The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice
Open accessAbstract
Bone substitutes are being increasingly used in surgery as over two millions bone grafting procedures are performed worldwide per year. Autografts still represent the gold standard for bone substitution, though the morbidity and the inherent limited availability are the main limitations. Allografts, i.e. banked bone, are osteoconductive and weakly osteoinductive, though there are still concerns about the residual infective risks, costs and donor availability issues. As an alternative, xenograft substitutes are cheap, but their use provided contrasting results, so far. Ceramic-based synthetic bone substitutes are alternatively based on hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphates, and are widely used in the clinical practice. Indeed, despite being completely resorbable and weaker than cortical bone, they have exhaustively proved to be effective. Biomimetic HAs are the evolution of traditional HA and contains ions (carbonates, Si, Sr, Fl, Mg) that mimic natural HA (biomimetic HA). Injectable cements represent another evolution, enabling mininvasive techniques. Bone morphogenetic proteins (namely BMP2 and 7) are the only bone inducing growth factors approved for human use in spine surgery and for the treatment of tibial nonunion. Demineralized bone matrix and platelet rich plasma did not prove to be effective and their use as bone substitutes remains controversial. Experimental cell-based approaches are considered the best suitable emerging strategies in several regenerative medicine application, including bone regeneration. In some cases, cells have been used as bioactive vehicles delivering osteoinductive genes locally to achieve bone regeneration. In particular, mesenchymal stem cells have been widely exploited for this purpose, being multipotent cells capable of efficient osteogenic potential. Here we intend to review and update the alternative available techniques used for bone fusion, along with some hints on the advancements achieved through the experimental research in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
In vitro and in vivo release of ciprofloxacin from PLGA 50:50 implants
Ramchandani, M., & Robinson, D. (1998) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(97)00113-2 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering
Chen, F.-M., & Liu, X. (2016) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 · Cited by 1,158
Applications of chitin and chitosan nanofibers in bone regenerative engineering
Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Shi, X., Zheng, H., Du, Y., Xiang, W., & Deng, H. (2020) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115658 · Cited by 341
Mesenchymal stem cells: Amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects
Kangari, P., Talaei-Khozani, T., Razeghian-Jahromi, I., & Razmkhah, M. (2020) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02001-1 · Cited by 286
Lin, K.-F., He, S., Song, Y., Wang, C.-M., Gao, Y., Li, J.-Q., Tang, P., Wang, Z., Bi, L., & Pei, G.-X. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b00815 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Campana, V., Milano, G., Pagano, E., Barba, M., Cicione, C., Salonna, G., Lattanzi, W., & Logroscino, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
- Published
- 2014-05-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2445-2461
- ISSN
- 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4838
- OpenAlex
- W2111469399
- Cited by
- 1,117
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2
- The paper
- Campana, V., Milano, G., Pagano, E., Barba, M., Cicione, C., Salonna, G., Lattanzi, W., & Logroscino, G. (2014). Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.